Date:   11/14/2004 2:39:14 PM ( 21 y ago)
Hits:   1,657
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=658285

Actually, Dr. Vinograd, the negative ion emission readings were posted on the K-Link USA website.

When I saw the readings, I wondered why the bodypure pads were so low.

The site is:

http://www.k-link-usa.com/compare.htm

and here is what they are posting:


Foot Pad Comparisons: Kinotakara give you the ideal amount of negatively charged ions, which have been digitally tested by an advanced ion tester. Between 1,200 and 1,300 ions is the most beneficial range, which was concluded by numerous testing.


Foot Pads Negative Ions

Kinotakara 1286
Shu-li 12
Body pure 9
Tree chi 3
Takara 3
Body and Sole 0


I don't think a company as big as K-Link would post information that would lead to a lawsuit. Do you?

So, again, my question is: Why are the body pure pads registering such a low negative ion reading?


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=658285