Date:   3/10/2005 9:17:21 AM ( 19 years ago ago)
Hits:   1,460
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=62705

3 of 3 (100%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

"There is no proof that flu shots work well in children under 2, concludes a study released Friday - the second in as many weeks to seriously challenge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's flu shot policies.

The Atlanta-based CDC countered that plenty of data support its
recommendation that children ages 6 to 23 months get the shots. The advice, adopted in 2003, was put into effect before the current flu season started.

"Immunization of very young children is not lent support by our findings," wrote the researchers, led by Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Vaccines Field in Rome. "We recorded no convincing evidence that vaccines can reduce mortality, admissions, serious complications and community transmission of influenza.""

My point of view:
Interestingly enough people, "they" (those who profit from administering and manufacturing and distributing vaccines)all say differently, yet can not and do not present any findings to support what "they" have to say. Why do "they" defend what "they" are doing? Because children are an ever increasing population that won't go away. WHo better to target. Anyway parents want what they think is best for their child. And "they" will make millions of dollars more. PLEASE learn to read between the lines. Become consciously competent parents and defend what is right for your families. Don't allow these money mongers brainwash you into thinking our bodies need these toxins in them to be healthy. It is so far from the truth.

By the way, there are more vaccines on the horizon, so watch out! Menengitis, Whooping cough BOOSTER (must not worked as well as "they" thought) and more. So much for lifelong immunity! Guess Science once again is losing the battle to nature!



©†ƒ……•™¼‡_Original_Message_¾€š½ž¢«»¬ï°©



"There is no proof that flu shots work well in children under 2, concludes a study released Friday - the second in as many weeks to seriously challenge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's flu shot policies.

The Atlanta-based CDC countered that plenty of data support its
recommendation that children ages 6 to 23 months get the shots. The advice, adopted in 2003, was put into effect before the current flu season started.

"Immunization of very young children is not lent support by our findings," wrote the researchers, led by Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Vaccines Field in Rome. "We recorded no convincing evidence that vaccines can reduce mortality, admissions, serious complications and community transmission of influenza.""

My point of view:
Interestingly enough people, "they" (those who profit from administering and manufacturing and distributing vaccines)all say differently, yet can not and do not present any findings to support what "they" have to say. Why do "they" defend what "they" are doing? Because children are an ever increasing population that won't go away. WHo better to target. Anyway parents want what they think is best for their child. And WE/"they" will make millions of dollars more. PLEASE learn to read between the lines. Become consciously competent parents and defend what is right for your families. Don't allow these money mongers brainwash you into thinking our bodies need these toxins in them to be healthy. It is so far from the truth.

By the way, there are more vaccines on the horizon, so watch out! Menengitis, Whooping cough BOOSTER (must not worked as well as "they" thought) and more. So much for lifelong immunity! Guess Science once again is losing the battle to nature!



 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=62705