Re: Reread the Lancet article by johng ..... Quackery Debate Forum
Date: 6/22/2005 5:10:18 PM ( 20 y ago)
Hits: 3,087
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=567070
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
the only relevant point was that 25% of the material, from one woman's flush, had not been explained. we have discussed the other items and doing so again would be quite boring and pointless. do you have something new?
john g
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=567070