CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: Oxygen Info ??? by John Cullison ..... Oxygen Therapies Support Forum

Date:   3/11/2003 9:41:20 PM ( 21 y ago)
Hits:   3,770
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=443468

Ummm... Tim, Dude. I suggested creating this forum a few days ago, as you can see in this post here, so please don't try to tell me what it's for and what it's not for, OK? Just because the forum creator "expanded" on my recommendation to include all the other things in the title doesn't in any way invalidate the intent of my desire for this forum, which is to discuss ALL oxygen therapies.

If you want to suggest (any further) that D2SO4 products are not oxygen therapy, then I suggest you take it up with Ed McCabe, OK? (Oh, wait, he's not a sell-out, he's just in it for the money, right? He's just another snake oil salesman, but you're happy to quote him when it suits your purpose...? What is your purpose, anyway?)

"There are MANY companies that have started producing 'liquid oxygen' products in the last few years, and most have very little Science to back up their claims."

Yes, and I've seen a web site which "debunks" them by making the same kinds of generalizations which you repeat here. In fact, reading your posts is virtually identical to reading that web site...

I have no problems with H2O2 (Hydrogen-Peroxid) and O3 - Ozone as therapies. I'd have to be some flavor of insane to object or to try to dissuade someone from pursuing them. That's not my point at all. But you are too eager to dismiss the D2SO4-based products with your generalizations, which have no "hard science" to back them up. What's this about? You reject things due to "lack of science", yet you offer criticism which is equally devoid of Science to back it up. You continue to find ways to suggest that there might be some fault with the product, all of which you've managed to come up with on-the-fly, not based on hard science. This is the same kind of bias and "know-best" attitude which actively impedes progress. For example:

"In fact, these nutrients could perhaps potentially react with the O- causing a decrease in effectiveness."

Yeah, except that you are still thinking that they've put O- in the product. Does O- in our bodies negatively affect the action of enzymes and amino acids and trace minerals? Not at all... This is something you just thought up, without any actual reason to think it up, other than to try to find a flaw in the product. Why?

You think people are being ripped off by oxygen products. There is probably some truth to your assertion. But I've actually tried these products, so I know they have merit. You haven't tried them at all, and you lack any scientific data to suggest that they don't work, yet you feel qualified to pass judgment on them or try to dissuade people away from them. Why?

Bonus points if you can respond without making more generalizations about how this product could be bad for you or a waste of money.

=-John-=

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=443468