Date:   6/17/2006 5:48:44 PM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   2,116
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=414494

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

36, read between the lines. John tries to present himself as a skeptic to both sides, but his writings clearly indicate and antievolutionary bias. The cynic in me would say this is a technique to make himself more appealing to rationalists.

I am also very open to the faults and lack of data in all aspects of science. I have not argued from authority and except for the case of dogs I have used the work of others to point out errors. I have also never made claims of omniscience, which would border on the supernatural. If you had been paying attention to my views on the suppernatural, you would know this. When it comes to dogs, I can confidently claim I know more than most. I have however owned working dogs all my life. I currently own a NVBK titled dutch and a Schutz 3, FR1 titled Beauce, and 1 stock working Kelpi - I like the pastoral group :)

Unlike the supernaturalists, rationalists are experts at recognizing the limitations of their knowledge and of knowledge in general. It is the irrationalists that create myths to cope with their fear of the unknown. This is why they never even get on the track. They are willing to believe any crackpot idea and because it cannot be proven wrong (even though many times it can) they assume it must be right.

You can also believe that little tiny men are pushing this message around the web so it can get to you, but I would not give this theory much cosideration.



 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=414494