Date:   3/26/2005 1:16:00 PM ( 20 y ago)
Hits:   3,000
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=342013

0 of 2 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Sorry, I don't AGREE 100% with you.

I agree that skin color may not be as important as those articles were implying, BUT ...

You wrote: "extremely inhumane circumstances under which they are asking to keep their child alive. "

Why is it inhumane to keep Sun Hudson alive?

Was he in a constant pain, screaming? No.

Even if yes, who gives us right to kill?

Yes, it is true that his chances of living healthy the next 20 years were 0, but why not let him live his next 3 months and then he would anyway die naturally?

Or is that what thye already tried, and it didn't work ... he wanted to live ...?

Wo are we to decide who's life should be terminated?

If a child was allowed to live for 6 months, when it was Crystal C. that child had no future, why not give him one more day?
And, then one more day?

Why is one more day so insignificant?

Look at the people older then 85 and suffering from Alzheimer.

Do they have future? No.

But why do we keep feeding them, when we could save money by letting them die of starvation? Isn't that the real reason why Sun Hudson's life support was terminated?


Who are we to make decision: "There is no enough money to keep your child alive!"


How is that possible that there is enough money to send support to 3rd world countries, but there is no enough money to keep Sun Hudson alive?


And, to tell you the truth, I doubt that you could kill a child of Bill Gates, Bill Clinton or any other rich guy, if he himself would be against it.

He would move child to another hospital, to another state, and he would keep child alive as along as possible, supppose that is what he wants!

It's all about money!

LCD
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=342013