Date:   1/2/2006 12:00:43 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   4,354
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=337700

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Lapis,

Thank you for taking the time to compose such a long post. Having a husband that is a certified Master of Crystology, and being a student myself of many different spiritual and mental healing aspects and methods, I have no issue or difficulty whatsoever understanding why so many different options, theories, modalities and healing methods must be considered, learned and employed. At the root of all, our life is physicial, spiritual and emotional...none supercede the other in importance or significance for healing (at least as far as my research and education shows).

The purpose of my post was a bit more specific than that, and apparently I didn't make myself very clear.

I was both concerned and truly seeking the answer to why it is/was that so many of the frequent advice givers in this particular forum seem to shy away from the Kelly/Gerson/Schulze/Christopher methods, in favor of the more recent, expensive and complex technological modalities (or those like Urine Therapy, which are more difficult to accept and comprehend for some).

When it comes to energy/spiritual healing and modalities, I respect your opinions, knowledge and information to the extreme. But I also know with my whole heart (or at least my whole experience so far), that many of those not as advanced, find it much easier to heal themselves when they can lock onto something solid that they can see, touch, understand and comprehend 'where they are'...and of course, the 'average' human is a LONG way away from even comprehending things like 'entities', 'collective consciousness', 'light energy', 'kundalini flow', etc. Therefore, I tend to shy away from those areas when offering advise, until I sense that a person is seeking for that knowledge and ready to accept it. And if they are, my current level of expertise would have me advising those types of folks to email you :)

I wasn't attempting to start a debate, or discuss whether one healing modality or another was "more better" than another (or one was "less better")...I was simply trying to increase my knowledge and comprehension by asking why it was that so many time-proven effective methods of healing that are so simple to understand, are not frequently recommended by folks who give advise on this board to those in life-threatening situations. Maybe it's simply because I'm the person that should be offering the advise and protocols that I know best; maybe it's because others become excited and enthusiastic about each new thing and forget the old; maybe it's because of specific faults or newly-proven aspects of the older healing modalities that I haven't heard of yet. Maybe it's something else entirely. I was just hoping to learn and understand.

Again, thank you so very much for your post; I alway learn something of value everytime I read anything you write.

Unyquity
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=337700