Date:   2/8/2006 2:50:07 PM ( 19 y ago)
Hits:   1,940
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=274743

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

some of the evidence in use today to support creation Science claims is fabricated or has been refuted. (the million-year-old clam in the chick tract, for example.) other supposed evidence against evolution is open to interpretation, or irrelevent to the question. mostly it's all used in such a way as to emotionally undermine people's trust in the evidence that is used to affirm evolution, as much as possible. trouble is, there's way too much of it to honestly call into question. creation Science advocates always find themselves attacking the emotionally provocative points of the theory, rather than focusing on the strong intellectual points such as the accurate theoretical predictions it makes. likewise they use and re-use strong emotional appeals for their side but do not have much of a logical supporting framework. this to me is a good indicator, unless something to the absolute contrary comes up, that evolution is actually more sound scientifically.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=274743