Curezone, this is serious by Cyrulis ..... Questioning & Criticizing Any Claims
Date: 10/15/2004 6:27:28 PM ( 20 y ago)
Hits: 6,928
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=273981
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
Oh my. I think your emotional post is a good reason why curezone was created- to share and to educate ourselves. There are already many opinions like yours posted what a quackery curezone and people who believe Liver-Flush and other things. So I would respectfully ask you to refrain from any similar posts: we heard you, we know your oppinion and don't bother doing that under different nicknames. Please. You would better contact mr. Weil or better yet, mr. Barret.
I feel like your post is party jus plain anger too. Why there is need to throw around phrases like TOS police and attorney general? Seems like you are scaring somebody, aren't you? This is not a civilized way of discussing things. I think for thing that you are telling curezone you will turn it into DA office, curezone should consider what to do about that.
Ok, I challenge you, I have stones in my freezer from the first LF. Let's send those stones into independant lab, maybe two labs that we both agree upon and we will se who is right and who is wrong. I say that stones are composed mainly of cholesterol, bile acids, bilrubin calcium and possibly other things, but dominate choleterol. If you say those stone are not made at least in a big part of cholesterol- there is a good basis for (and admit I am wrong.) in hands, publicly. If I am right all I want you to do is to say publicly- I am wrong and I don't need you a cent from you. If stones are at least made in part of cholesterol they were made in the liver as liver is the only place in the body that is sufficient to produse that amount of cholesterol to form cholesterol stones and it does not not matter, whether they are still in in liver or already in gallbladder. If these stones are not made in lover where thrse are formed according to you?
It absolute nonsence to imply that liver does not do anything other than eliminate stuff. I can't believe i have read that. How about the fact that our liver produces (not eliminates something) majority of our cholesterol needs, how about that liver stores glucagon et cetera? Many many things liver does.
Have you ever heard of the autopsy facts of John Wayne and Elvis Presley?- that one of them had 40lb of undigested matter in his intestines and the other had 60lb? And do you seriously say that that well, you drink enough water and everything will be fine? You don't need enemas or LF'es if you live in perfect world (meaning without hundreds additives, coal burning plants subproducts raining on your head on so on). Yeah, if you are absolutely clean, breath absolutely clean air and live absolutely without stress, witout any contacts of chemicals, without ever getting any parasites/viruses/bacteria. Good luck.
And I think there are no proof for your quackery claims. Show me your 200-800 million dollar double blind study where you proved that enemas are nonsence. Please. I guess that's your dream- to chock everybody and demand those impossible (except for Big Pharma)studies. Show me your scientific proof.
And since you provided your name could you provide us wioth your website as well so that we could read more info about your studies? Or something?
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.13 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=273981