Date:   8/3/2004 4:50:51 PM ( 21 y ago)
Hits:   1,561
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=269556

here are the real cancer stats - in the face of the ACI giving the impression cancers were on the decline. Mass media , in June 2004, gave the public that impression too. Its a hoax, and a dis-service to us all, to say cancer rates are not increasing when they are zooming - look at non-smoking cancers!!
KK
----------
copy/paste stats from article "Jason... :

The incidence rates there have been major increases in a very wide range of non-smoking cancers, in some instances up to about 100 percent. You wouldn't get that impression at all from reading the [June 3 report]. From 1991 to 2001 you can look at some cancers that have gone up by fifty percent like thyroid cancer's gone up by 50 percent, acute myeloid leukemia by 18 percent, kidney cancer 13 percent, liver cancer 20 percent. Childhood cancers have gone up, too.

Far more importantly, if you look at the data from 1975 to 2001, what you see is increases in some cancers, like non-Hodgkins lymphoma by 70 percent, kidney 70 percent, thyroid 65 percent, testes 50 percent, Breast Cancer 30 percent, childhood cancers 30 percent, etc. So in fact there's been a massive increase in the incidences of non-smoking cancers from 1975 to 2001 and that increase is being maintained in the last decade or so.
-------
And from 1975 to 2001 the increase in a wide range of non-smoking cancers has been massive and that has persisted over the last decade. They admit that there are "statistical uncertainties related to changes in data collection." Last year, in the 2003 report, they claimed that death rates were stabilizing. Now they've said they're on the decline. So the whole thing is full of holes and the media have been taken for a ride.
--------
Epstein: The price for the new biotech drugs has increased 500 fold in the last decade.

Chowka: Overall, where are we in the war on cancer?

Epstein: You have to view this in perspective of a whole series of claims over the last 25-30 years. The interesting thing is, if you plot the increase in the incidence of cancer over the last thirty years or so, it parallels the increase in the NCI budget. So the answer to that is, the more money you spend, the more cancer you get.

Chowka: The problems are institutionalized now at every level.

Epstein: There are overwhelming conflicts of interest - the National Cancer Institute, the cancer drug industry, the American Cancer Society, which extend to the petrochemical, oil, steel, and drug industries. So you're dealing with overwhelming conflicts of interest coupled with professional mindsets which are fixated on damage control and are indifferent to prevention.

----
NON-PATENTABLE cures LINK -
Finally, on June 8, 2004, the Boston Globe announced the outcome of OCCAM's protracted preliminary review of "714X".

"The cases of five patients who say they were cured of cancer by a controversial alternative medicine were not compelling enough to justify a government-funded study of the 714X compound, the National Cancer Institute apparently has decided. . . 'The presented data was insufficient to recommend NCI-sponsored research using 714X in the treatment of cancer,' Colleen O. Lee of the NCI's Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine wrote in a May 17 e-mail to Gaston Naessens, a Canadian biologist and developer of the compound made from mineral salts, nitrogen-rich camphor and some trace elements."


note - non-patented cures and therapies are ignored in favour of the more expensive and much more profitable patented pills the pharmacy wants us to use, never mind the effectiveness and dangers of them.
[They don't want us to actually avoid cancers by using natural therapies either...]

"non-patented" cures are things like naturally occuring things, like OXYGEN therapies that have proven usefull in beating or not getting cancers. Or Zappers for getting over it and avoiding cancers, or Colloidal Silver , or organic foods.

Patents are granted to pills they make in labs.

Karlin.






 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=269556