Date:   10/3/2016 2:49:20 PM ( 8 y ago)
Hits:   2,097
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2337553

You're welcome, and glad to help wherever possible.

That said, I personally found the Spooky2 concept to have great potential based on frequency and feature customization.

However, and unfortunately, I didn't have much time to test the unit in contact mode before the spike incident. Though I am confident that it could have been effective had it of worked properly in my own case. - ie, my treatment area was on the lower left jawbone, to which I'd add, you can imagine my reluctance to continue using past a 48+ volt jolt from the nominal 7.3v setting. - Needless to say, the units have been shelved since then, and I've been working on a homemade circuit with fail safes as an alternative.

As for the sellers and endorsements, I cannot say. Though they were willing to replace both of units for me without question. Though I honestly don't think I could ever trust these devices for contact use personally. Though I'm thinking they would be fine using the remotes. - which I have no faith in personally. - but that's just me

Hope this helps

PS. I saw an alternative to the Spooky2 device using a frequency generator and signal amplifier. To which I'd add, would equate a Spooky2 equivalent. ie, I saw a thread with schematics in the no so distance past that looked quite promising.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.14 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=2337553