Date:   3/21/2016 11:09:44 PM ( 8 y ago)
Hits:   5,441
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2309821

>- I think it works for any water based system,

Actually, the old zappers did not work so well. The standard 30 kHz killed some but nowhere near all of the microbes in the water jugs. 2500 Hz killed some but not all. 1000 Hz killed some but not all. 15 Hz killed some but not all. That was the point of the study. It took multiple frequencies in sequence to thoroughly kill all of the microbes.

>- If it fails someone,

That is not the issue. I sold many thousands of dual frequency zappers between 2001 and 2006 and then surveyed the customers a few months after they received their zappers. The customers were asked to rate their success and in a different query they told about how they used the zapper.

2500 Hz yes/no
how many minutes, how many times repeated, daily?, paddles? wrist straps? paddles and pads?

30000 Hz yes/no
how many minutes, how many times repeated, daily?, paddles? wrist straps? paddles and pads?

They were then rated on a formula. Generally, the ones who had the lowest scores had the poorest results, but this was not always true.

One problem that I found was that each zapper was slightly different from the others.

The problem there is that a 2500 Hz is never exactly 2500 Hz. One might be 2480, another might be 2570. In the 30000 Hz units one might be 29702 Hz while another might be 31334 Hz. The tolerance of the circuit used was often +/-5 percent or even 10 percent. The ones made using certain Radio Shack parts could be even more than 20 percent off.

What does 20 percent mean to a 30000 Hz zapper? The actual frequency could be anywhere between 24000 Hz and 36000 Hz depending on the components used.

So, if you had the x disease which needed 28990 Hz, and your zapper produced 33200 Hz, you were literally SOL. However, if you had the Y disease, which needed 22187 Hz, then that unit might work great.

So, how many people got perfect results from their old style Clark zappers?

According to Dr. Thiel's study, "48.2% reported substantial symptomatic improvement (between 75% improvement to complete remission),". Yes, less than half had better than 75 percent improvement but that is still far better than the control group who did not use a zapper but did everything else "In the control group, ... 12.9% reported significant improvement,". So, using the zapper definitely helped many but not all.

The question was why and that is one reason that I have done all of the surveys and studies. As you stated before, you sensed that something was wrong. It was with the old Clark zapper.

Dr. Clark's idea that we could take a shortcut and use just one frequency was a good one but sadly was a wrong conclusion.

The surveys also showed me that using 2 frequencies ( 7 on freq #1 - 7 on freq #2 - 20 off ) repeated 3 times produced much better results and higher customer satisfaction. The second frequency was definitely killing microbes that the first missed.

BTW, do you know where Dr. Clark studied for her Doctorate in Naturopathy? At the Clayton School of Natural Medicine. Yes, right here. Oh! and I even have some of their old equipment. In their final few years, they moved into an office building that just happened to be owned by one of my uncles. So when they collapsed, I knew who was responsible for removing the equipment that was abandoned. Not of great importance, just trivia.

But in response to your comment about Dr. Clark not knowing about the Medical Electric Battery. Yes, it was part of the curricula as was Rife, Bare, Crane, Tesla, Lahkovsky, and many others.

>- Yours is really a Rife machine if frequencies are what matter.

Actually, as already explained, I started out with 30000 Hz and that did not work as described so I added 2500 Hz. Those 2 frequencies were all that I offered for 3 years but after repeated reading of Dr. Thiel's statement "When long term staphylococcus infections were present that did not clear up with conventional Antibiotic treatments, the engineered model seemed to be substantially more effective than the commercial model.", I decided to make my own Engineered model. The ParaZapper MX blew everything else out of the water. Even the VA took notice and then the FDA found out. That was when they really came after us.

The MX did not use Rife frequencies but instead used 8 generic frequencies around 2500 Hz. That was when I knew that there was more to zapping than a single frequency or even 2 frequencies.

>- depending on frequencies is not as effective

So, if it is not as effective, why does it kill all the microbes in the jars while the old Clark zapper does not even come close? The Beck Zapper does not kill all of them either.








 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=2309821