Date:   11/28/2015 1:01:52 PM ( 9 y ago)
Hits:   3,140
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2289736

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

From Dr. Robert Thiel's study: "due to an extra integrated circuit, its output sweeps the frequency in steps of 2KHz from 20-40 kHz (this sweeping is believed by the developer to generate an output at 10 times as many frequencies than the commercial model)"


This model basically used 10 frequencies but the frequencies were not specifically targeted as the ones in ParaZapper models are. It also applied each frequency for only 1 minute where 7 minutes per frequency tends to produce much better results.

The following claim is of significant importance: "When long term staphylococcus infections were present that did not clear up with conventional Antibiotic treatments, the engineered model seemed to be substantially more effective than the commercial model."

Also, he reports that the over-all increase in improvement was not very significant: "97.4% zapped with the commercial model and 98.4% with the engineered model (both combined with supplementation) reporting improvement.". This is likely due to the 1 minute per frequency.

Also, in the discussion: "This trial suggests that since only 48.3% improved substantially, zapping probably did not kill "all bacteria, viruses and parasites".

I would submit that there are several factors that reduced the effectiveness compared to ParaZapper.

First, The subjects only used the copper paddles verses the combined copper paddles and augmentation foot-pads which in some cases double the results. This is especially true when trying to reach deep into internal organs.

Second, is the amount of time allocated per frequency. In our customer feedback, we found that even 3-1/2 minutes or 5 minutes was not sufficient to completely eliminate any one specific strain of microbe. In this respect, Dr. Clark was right that 7 minutes should be considered a minimum time for each frequency, regardless of voltage. A time of 10 minutes per frequency will in some cases produce much better results.

Third, the stepped frequencies used were basically random, they were not specific to any particular microbe. The use of specific frequencies that produce specific harmonics that are directed toward specific microbes is likely to produce far better results.

As an example, the ParaZapper MX also produced a series of frequencies that were random steps in the 2500 Hz range but it included the frequency 2489 Hz which according to the CAFL "Dental_foci, Dental_infection, Dental_infection_1, Dental_infections_TR, Toothache, ". Using the MX was reported to have reduced dental abscesses significantly with as little as 1 hours usage. In some cases, severe abscesses were claimed by some users to be almost gone in as little as 24 hours.

As a note: The ParaZapper MX is no longer made or sold. We now have better models available for those who may be interested in researching.


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=2289736