Date:   7/15/2014 12:24:20 AM ( 11 y ago)
Hits:   5,168
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2188259

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

The Bioelectric "Clark-style" works good. Two 9 volts batteries, so it has higher output. I actually use the 9.6 volts rechargeable batteries in it, that are charged up to 11 volts. I had that zapper for 3 years now and it is still going strong.
It has noticeably higher output. I also often use the handhelds under the armpits, so I can do stuff and zap a long time. I think you get a far better connection through the body that way. That method is way too strong for the Beck style zapper, but I experimented with footplates and handhelds also with the Beck style zapper. It seems to get deeper into tissue where microbes will hide. There are probably some simple ways to vastly improve zappers with method. It is a good thing that you alert people not to use the same wrist method and use either ankle to ankle or wrist to wrist to make sure the blood supply is actually zapped.
The biggest drawback to zapper efficiency is often the end-user. Many people are too lazy to stay with it and zap many hours a day.
I am making 316 stainless steel heel plates to go in the shoes so a zapper can be used pretty much all day with the ankle to ankle mode.
I zap about 18 hours a total with both Beck style and Clark style zappers. Energy levels are great. Zero perceived side-effects from Atripla. I use you Beck style zapper at 10 hertz immediately after taking Atripla. I use an ankle to opposite wrist method overnight. Zero problems I can tell.
Recently I started using your Candida "Clark" style zapper many hours. A viral load test will be this month and I will see if that made the difference. I think it would be best if people used both types of zappers. :) They do different things.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=2188259