Date:   6/18/2014 6:17:25 AM ( 10 y ago)
Hits:   4,322
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2181509

Hi ino, I can see where someone would share such a view. And don't get me wrong, I'm in no way suggesting that you should not be entitled to your position on matters. I mean, in most every case of Colloidal Silver production. I could see where someone might conclude such information as overkill against the notion that good needn't be better if it gets the job well done.

However, under the terms of reflection, I'd like to offer the following questions for your consideration:

Can we really say this applies to everyone?
Are there other possibilities beyond that of striving for perfection?
Where do such things as; process improvements fit into all this?
Is it safe to say that the current standards and process methods can't be improved upon?
Can we honestly say that all solutions are truly created equal? ie, what would we consider a solution permeated with silver oxides as opposed to a solution that is free of oxides?
Is it possible that some solutions can proven to be more effective than others? ie, particle size, density, type and variants etc.
Do you feel electrochemistry is scientific?
What differentiates Science from art in your view?
Is it possible that you're current position comes at the cost of the progressive nature of alternative health?
Do you believe we should stop or limit our endeavors to try and improve on such things as the process from which Colloidal Silver is made?

I hope you don't take offence to my post as it is intended to be of a a passive nature rather than an attack on your views and valued opinion.

Take care
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=2181509