CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: Enemas by dvjorge ..... Ask Dr Eric Bakker

Date:   5/13/2013 5:34:48 PM ( 12 y ago)
Hits:   3,956
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2064999

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Dr,
I respectfully disagree with some of your points in your answer.
High enemas to treat an intestinal fungal overgrowth isn't a myth. In fact, according to the testimonies left in many patient forums, it has been the only possible way to come back to normal of many severe candidiasis cases.

First, Nystatin retention enemas are well documented in the literature written by pioneers MD about this syndrome. I guess you have read some of them or all. I have read all the literature available about CRC.

If you dig Curezone archive, you will find incredible stories of recovering after doing enemas to treat this syndrome.

I will give you the reasons why they are important and you can debate them with me if you like.

First, the small bowel is almost sterile by nature. It isn't the preferred place for microbial growth when body fluids and intestinal transit work well. As you know, HCL, bile, pancreatic enzymes, and sodium bicarbonate released by the pancreas keep it almost sterile. Candida species aren't an exception. They find an hostile environment in the small bowel. I dont mean it can not be affected by a fungus growth, but if we get it in the SB, we need to think about twice the amount in the lower intestinal part. However, the colon is a preferred place for microbial growth because it is there where putrefaction, decomposition, and fermentation take place. It is documented in the books written by Dr. Truss, Dr. Crook, etc that candida overgrowth occur mostly in the colon and the lower part of the small bowel.
Let think about the limitations of the current treatment.
Most, if not all, natural or Rx antifungals are absorbed by the intestines and go to the bloodstream. Those substances haven't impact on the fungal colonies living inside the intestinal lumen since there isn't blood irrigation reaching the lumen. Antifungal substance don't have any delivery mechanism to those areas. Another point is the length of the intestines. All substances taken orally will mix with decomposed food, dead flora, and fluid forming a fecal bowl in the way of intestinal transit. It is almost impossible to take an oral antifungal, in enough concentration, that has contact with the colon walls where the fungal colonies live and be still effective. Most of these yeast colonies live on the mucous layer that protect the intestinal walls.

As you see, oral therapies have many limitations in order to be effective against an infection living in the colon lumen.

It doesn't matter if the sufferer use a purge drink, bentonite clay, or any other form of cleanse, the most effective way to target fungus living in the colon is using the shorter route, specially doing retention enemas with an antifungal substance.

I am a candida sufferer (severe case) who have had the chance of testing almost all the known avenues to treat this syndrome. My response to high enemas plus Nystatin retention enemas have been the same documented in Curezone by other sufferers with severe cases.

Technically, it is impossible to remove dead tissues, fungal colonies (?) biofilms (?)or part of the infected mucous without using the water flow and retention enemas.

The most relevant reference is the speed of recovering people experience after doing this procedure. In fact, I see no way to recover if the colon isn't treated effectively.

Both way must be used to treat a severe intestinal candidiasis. High enemas can not reach the lower small bowel, then the infection should be treated using the oral and rectal way.
The fastest release and speed toward to recover is seen after doing retention enemas.

Jorge.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=2064999