Date:   7/4/2012 11:18:01 PM ( 12 y ago)
Hits:   19,193
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1959826

Although the symptoms and diseases are as different as night and day, there is a common failure pattern here. The miniscule size of acetaldehyde is allowing it access to places where it shouldn't be and its reactivity is allowing it to bond to configurations where it doesn't belong. Then, once it reacts, it remains there, impairing the structure or function of the biological entity that was unfortunate enough to be exposed to it. Furthermore, it does this in a clandestine fashion since its two carbon, four hydrogen, and one oxygen atoms just blend into the landscape without exposing themselves to analysis like a heavy metal ion would.

Other healing regimens ("Food Is Your Best Medicine" by H. G. Bieler, MD, 1966) have embraced the theory that "...disease is caused by a toxemia which results in cellular impairment and breakdown…" without clearly realizing what it was or where it was coming from. C. O. Truss, MD ("The Missing Diagnosis", 1976) has expanded upon this by giving this toxin a name, "acetaldehyde", and a source "Candida Albicans" so that the nature of the damage can be characterized and rectified.

If the Wondro message -- that an amazing variety of apparently unrelated disease processes can respond to something as simple as a daily dose of an exceptionally potent but metabolically benign oral acetaldehyde scavenger -- is true, then it implies that every disease condition that has remained a conundrum to modern medicine should be re-examined from an acetaldehyde toxicity perspective. Even the prognosis of diseases that are well understood and treatable may improve if the impact of this toxin is removed from the background.

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1959826