Date:   4/21/2012 1:42:44 AM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   3,590
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1931824

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Shrimpy: My intent is not provoke arguments (which by the way are worthless) but there is little ground to argue against the infective nature of blastocystis - there are too many valid scientific citations to deny its pathogenic nature.

There once was argumentation concerning its pathogenic nature until the subtypes of blasto were found (blastocystis is a diverse or wide spectrum organism that has variations in which a large portion is not pathogenic but 11 subtypes have been identified as pathogenic)

On what basis can you support your claim?

http://www.bhomcenter.org/pdfs/BLASTOCYSTIS_STUDIES.pdf


http://www.uptodate.com/contents/blastocystis-species/abstract/24

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1931824