CureZone   Log On   Join
 

NYCLU: Brookfield Had No Legal Right To Eject Protesters From Park by pepe ..... Occupy Wall Street

Date:   2/18/2012 12:14:00 AM ( 12 y ago)
Hits:   668
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1910447

0 of 2 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

http://gothamist.com/2012/02/17/nyclu_joins_legal_fight_for_occupy.php



http://gothamist.com/attachments/nyc_arts_john/021712ows.jpg


Brookfield Properties had no legal right to force Occupy Wall Street protesters out of Zuccotti Park in November, the NYCLU argues in a legal brief made public yesterday. The civil liberties group intends to file an amicus brief in support of a demonstrator named Ronnie Nunez, who was arrested when he refused to leave Zuccotti Park after the NYPD raided it on November 15th. According to the NYCLU, Brookfield had no legal authority to exclude people from the public space, which Brookfield is legally required to keep open to the public 24/7. From the filing:

City zoning law makes unambiguously clear that private owners must obtain the advance approval of the City Planning Commission (“CPC”) before enforcing any restrictions on public access to a privately owned public space [POPS]. The law also makes clear that before the CPC can authorize any restrictions, there must be strict compliance with important procedural protections that are designed to protect public access.

Since the creation of Zuccotti Park in 1968, the public has had a permanent license to be present. In lieu of CPC approval, Brookfield had no authority to exclude Mr. Nunez or anyone else from Zuccotti Park. Therefore, the accusatory instrument against Mr. Nunez is insufficient and Defendants’ motion to dismiss the information should be granted.

POPS are akin to “an easement held by the public on the owner’s property.” As spaces legally mandated to be open and accessible for the public’s benefit and use, POPS are subject to constitutional protections as traditional public fora under the First Amendment. Indeed, courts have acknowledged that when a space is explicitly designated for public use, like a POPS, it is clear that such areas are “inherently compatible” with First Amendment activity and subject to constitutional protections as traditional public fora.

Nunez faces charges of trespassing, obstructing governmental administration and disorderly conduct charge. His attorney tells the Times, "All of those charges have to start with a lawful order, otherwise the cops are just bouncers with badges." You can peruse the ful text of the legal brief below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/81975361/NYCLU-Amicus-Brief

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1910447