Date:   1/31/2012 6:53:35 PM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   10,456
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1905431

Give me a **reason** for doing something. Speeches are nice but I'm looking for a solid scientific argument (presentation).

Cutler has done that and after reading different views, my best judgement is that his protocol is currently the safest effective way to deal with a heavy metal problem.

I actually was seriously considering Boyd Haley's OSR. I think very highly of Haley as well. However OSR is not well tested. I was not interested in rolling the dice, certainly not before I gave the safest method a year or so to do what it could. I also assumed that after allowing DMSA + ALA remove much of the HMs for a year or so, there would likely be less risk in trying OSR or something else.
Excellent information from Haley, former chair of the Chem dept at the U of KY.
http://www.myspace.com/video/vid/7383821

A shorter summary in text of the Haley's views are here.
http://www.mercuryexposure.info/scandals/studies/saxe-alzheimers-study/item/7...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvMAdHWT6Yk

Boyd Haley debunks the ADA claim: Only minute amounts of mercury are released from amalgam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnfBhdT7uU0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WM1c7VSP70

Alzheimers and genetics
http://www.stelior.ee/Boyd_Haley_Medical_Veritas_AD_paper_final.pdf


Obviously OSR is no longer available in the US so not an option any longer for me. The bone density of my back has improved 8% and is almost normal now. I've had numerous other less impressive improvements but there is no **reason** for me to make a change at this time.

If someone makes a better argument/case for the use of something else, I'll certainly consider a switch. I'm still waiting for the **reason** to switch.



 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1905431