CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: So a more accurate statement would be... by parazapper ..... Zapper Support Forum

Date:   1/20/2012 12:17:37 PM ( 12 y ago)
Hits:   19,409
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1902022

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

>- It depends on the kind of infections you are trying to kill, some parasitic worms are more resistant than some small organisms. And it depends also on where the infection is located in the body, because some parts are more difficult to reach with a high enough intensity.

No one, including myself, claims that it is not more difficult to kill certain organisms than it is to eliminate others. I am saying that it takes the right combination, not just brute strength.

>- are false if a weak zapper is used with only 2 handholds and 2 footpads,

I absolutely agree, but the problem is that strength can be found in ways other than brute strength. Effectiveness requires the right frequency, along with the right rise time of the waveform, along with the right polarity, along with properly placed electrodes, along with sufficient wattage applied.

>- Parasitic worms are living organisms. Their bodies can probably be damaged by a high enough current as a human body can be damaged by a high enough current.

Certainly, this is true, but that is not the only way to kill them. Again, brute strength is not necessarily the right answer. You need to find a solution that is not damaging to your body. You can kill the worms by taking sufficient arsenic but is that the right choice? You will survive, but may suffer for many years things worse than worms.

>- Also show me the proof that you have managed to kill several kinds of parasitic worms in a human body with a specific frequency, and i buy your device today.

Sorry, but if I did that, you would not be able to buy that zapper, because I would be in prison.

I can tell you that even before we produced our new models, we surveyed our customers and of those who reported to had Ascaris, 100 percent reported noticible results. The number reporting was a small group. Yes, I have also seen posts by those who did not have good results but I do not know what products they used.

As for our current devices, we do not collect any survey data because of the FDA.

>- I have nothing against your zapper, but it has a similar output voltage, a similar waveform, a similar frequency than the Ultimate zapper, except it works on a 9V battery, so why your zapper should be better ?

Yeeouch! You need to read up.

http://petzapper.com/confused_best_zapper.html


http://petzapper.com/UZI.html


>- I really prefer you behavior

Appreciated.

I know that zappers are imperfect as far as the current state of the art goes. There are issues that need to be addressed and excessive hype damages the progress. I am doing all that I can to move the state of the art forward rather than sitting back and collecting as much profit as possible.

Even Rife technology is not perfect as I am certain that Newport and others on the Rife forum will agree with. The Beck protocol is not perfect. But there are valuable aspects to each of these technologies that when properly combined will produce better results than any of these alone. This is why I have combined Rife frequencies into my newest zapper models. This is why I provide up to eight different Rife frequencies in series. To achieve better results.

Additionally, I want you to understand that there are definite risks to brute power in zapping. I have seen and heard of a few cases of neuropathic damage from high powered zappers. Some of these individuals suffer from constant pain as a result. Use caution in your actions.


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.03 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1902022