According to my output chart, I can get to around 42-44 ug, and perhaps a bit higher. Is it safe to get to ozone values close to 50 ug for 20 mins of insufflation, 3 times a day?
Yes, but I would not exceed that.
Moreover, you once wrote that the true concentration of ozone in the blood is different from the output, since it breaks down and reacts with bacteria, etc. Does this apply to immune suppression as well, in that dosages a little higher than 50 ug will not adversely affect the immune system since the true concentration is lower?
There will not be significant breakdown so I still would not exceed 50ug/ml.
How important is it to have bowel movements and/or enemas prior to insufflation? You've never mentioned them, but there are lots of sites that recommend them to supposedly prevent any reaction with fecal matter and thus ensure more ozone concentration. In short, are dosages of around 50 ug (or perhaps slightly higher) safe and recommended for 20 mins, 3 times daily?
As far as bowel movements this is a good idea, but mainly to allow more space for the ozone. Otherwise the pressure could stimulate a bowel movement. I don't bring this up though since we cannot really time bowel movements so that we make sure we have one before rectal insufflation. And I don't want people trying to "time" their bowel movements by taking stimulant laxatives such as senna, cascara sagrada, rhubarb root or aloes since these will only cause more problems down the road.
As far as enemas go these also have their drawbacks, and the excess moisture will also contribute to ozone breakdown. So their reasoning on this is flawed.
Also, to comment on my brother's post... although there is heightened glucose metabolism at the site of the bone lesions, I found this:
CONCLUSION: Radiologists should be aware of the high accumulation of FDG in some benign bone lesions, especially histiocytic or giant cell–containing lesions. Consideration of histologic subtypes should be included in analysis of SUV at FDG PET of primary bone tumors.
Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been used extensively to differentiate malignant tumors from benign lesions in many organ systems (1–3). In the musculoskeletal system, preliminary results (4–7) indicated the usefulness of FDG PET in the differentiation between malignant and benign bone and soft-tissue tumors. However, a recent report (8) raised questions about a clear correlation between the FDG accumulation and the malignant potential of bone tumors. Furthermore, high accumulation of FDG has been reported (9,10) in many kinds of inflammatory lesions, including chronic osteomyelitis and rheumatoid arthritis. The previous FDG PET studies concerning bone tumors included a relatively small number of cases of benign lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the standardized uptake value (SUV) with FDG PET to differentiate benign from malignant bone lesions.
...
In conclusion, radiologists should be aware of a high accumulation of FDG in some benign bone tumors and tumorlike lesions, especially histiocytic or giant cell–containing lesions. These lesions cannot be distinguished from malignant bone tumors by using SUV with FDG PET. It is hoped this information will be of practical value, particularly given the increasing clinical use of FDG PET in a variety of settings.
http://radiology.rsna.org/content/219/3/774.full
In other words, heightened glucose metabolism is common enough in arthritic and bone-related conditions so that it should not be used as the basis for diagnosis. Also, keep in mind that she has been taking oxycodone and Exalgo, and that painkillers are often associated with the destruction of bone tissue and cartilage. Nor has she been doing the Rife machine until tonight, and thus has cut herself off from the primary means by which she eliminated her bone pain months prior -- through electrical stimulation. I hope that as she returns to the Rife machine, the stimulation will allow the lesions to heal and any other damage to repair. This bone pain was very severe many months ago, prior to the Rife, and promptly went away once she began the therapy, then came back with heightened use of painkillers and a lack of use of the Rife machine.
Given all of this, these don't seem like metastases.
I agree and addressed a lot of this in my previous post.
By the way, Rife units or electrical stimulation units will help increase bone growth.