Date:   9/26/2011 4:29:18 PM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   3,332
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1862351

3 of 6 (50%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

"admit it: defending the liver flush against critiques of the liver flush is your highest priority. Higher even than the truth."

So are you critiquing the liver flush here? What is your point and what are you trying to prove?

I know the answer. You have an emotional and personal vendetta against me because you posted a thread about the carcinogenic effects of bile on the colon and with one sentence I derailed your entire thread and line of thinking. After all the time and energy copy+pasting "third party evidence" my simple statement that the epsom salts swiftly eliminate the bile was all that was needed to prove your thread pointless and poorly thought out. But what really made you fuming was how I showed your own "3rd party evidence" to support the liver flush by removing carcinogenic bile from the liver, where it CAN do damage if stagnant.

Let's look at some of your "3rd party evidence" here:

"The distal part of the small intestine contains greater numbers of bacteria (10⁸/mL)  and Populations of bacteria in the colon reach levels of 10¹¹/mL feces. "

Did it even cross your conditioned mind to think that the concentration of bacteria in the large instestines is higher because the large intestines is where FLUID is absorbed? Your own evidence once again even refers to it as "feces". And what did I already state?

Do all the reading, copy and pasting you want. Without the ability to comprehend what you read it is not going to help you one bit. I am not talking about the fluid concentrations of bacteria. This is obviously in the context of the intestinal lining. Now let's look at your other self-exposing statement:

"but do you really think it's washing all of the bacteria out of your mucosal lining?? GOOD LORD are you in need of some brain power."

Good, so you at least know what a mucosal lining is. Your error is in thinking that just because the small intestines has villi for nutrient absorption that it does not have a mucusal lining where microflora grow and flourish in abundance. Don't worry, "we all make mistakes". Your mistakes  come with insults, though.

And yes, of course the mucosal lining of the intestines can be washed clean. This is common sense and is also why it is a common practice to replenish microflora after having flushed out the small and large intestines during a liver flush.

So much for all your excitement.  At least you are still disrespectful!

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1862351