Date:   8/30/2011 1:16:23 PM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   7,497
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1853010

2 of 3 (66%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

"ROTFLMAO!!! This is a great example of how gullible the Liver-Flush supporters really are! They will believe any made up claim they read on the internet as long as it supports their false beliefs about "liver flushing."

Funny, this is exactly what everyone who has successfully purged their liver of intrahepatic stones thinks about you: You will believe any claim you read on the internet so long as it supports your false belief about liver flushing. Copy paste as many studies as you want; It is already common knowledge that bile and oil can saponify in the intestines. But to take that fact and use it to "disprove"
the release of intrahepatic stones is downright idiotic.

"So here we already have solid proof that the poster is making up the whole story."

csfguy is a medical doctor. I thought you get on your knees and worship the medical establishment?


"First thing to keep in mind that the gallbladder is only about 4 inches by 1 inch in size."

Not if it's inflamed and full of stones. Which is the obvious diagnosis of this persons gallbladder.

"Second thing to keep in mind is that real Gallstones are extremely slow to form."

If by "real gallstones" you are referring to fully calcified Gallstones or bile pigment stones, then obviously they are slow to form.

However, as reported by telman, they were not all fully calcified Gallstones or pigment stones. Read his account again in detail.

"This means that if these were all real gallstones then they would all have had to be in the gallbladder originally since they would not have time to form to the sizes stated. And all the "flushes" were completed within a two weak period."

A statement stemming from your obvious lack of understanding regarding the liver flush. Also a testament to your poor and incomplete reasoning, and inability to apply logic to basic cause and effect reasoning. It is a well known occurence for calcified stones to remain in the gallbladder even while intrahepatic stones are being released, until they are dislodged sometimes months or years later. It is also a well known occurence for intrahepatic stones to be calcified.

"Now keeping all this in mind let's consider large the gallbladder would have to be for this story to be true. Not even including the "sludge" and "gravel" he claims out the total size of the "stone" count would be over 125 centimeters or OVER 49 inches!!!"

LOLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!! What the hell is wrong with you? It's called VOLUME. Go do a google search and find out what it means.

Hhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaaaa!!!

The Fecal Soap Avenger! what a riot


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1853010