Date:   6/13/2011 9:44:48 AM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   1,217
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1823584

Hello Spud,

I disagree...

We are here to debate the support side. If you look at the title of the support forum you will find that it includes Miracle-Mineral-Supplement and sodium chlorite. That opens up the debate side to also debate sodium chlorite. As I posted this I noticed that the debate forum also includes sodium chlorite.

The Miracle-Mineral-Supplement protocol(s) is flawed, but there may be something beneficial to sodium chlorite.

The purpose of debate is to bring forth arguments that enlighten and educate and lead to better methods of use.

This results in new discovery and change.

For example: The initial protocol Jim Humble came up with caused severe poisoning reactions in many people. On the debate side we "discussed" this in great detail.

This resulted in a "new discovery" by Jim Humble regarding how long he thinks chlorine dioxide lasts in the body, and a new protocol(s) to try to incorporate this new discovery information. This has resulted in a great reduction in adverse effects. Before people would get violently ill, now they just suffer near the edge of nausea.

To borrow an analogy from alcohol, the initial protocol had people drinking half a bottle of whiskey twice a day. They got hammered and paid dearly. The new protocol has them drinking a shot an hour, all day. Still not good, but better. The goal of debate is to educate and move to the point where a glass of wine with dinner may actually help.

Comparing other oxidizers and protocols is a good way to gain perspective on sodium chlorite. As to effectiveness, that is difficult. However, I think people could benefit if they had one more arrow in their quiver.

Tom
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1823584