I note you failed to address actual oleander sites or case reports by Dquixote1217 ..... CureZone Moderators Debate and Complaints
Date: 2/16/2011 4:39:01 AM ( 13 y ago)
Hits: 504
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1770619
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
First of all, the Minnesota Wellness Directory is not an "oleander site", which is what you said to begin with (actually you said sites plural) not a "pro-oleander site" as you have now conveniently modified your description after being proven wrong.. Secondly, the information on the site about oleander is years old and as a matter of fact, my friend who owns the site, has asked ME to do write an updated entry. Just FYI, the site recommends oleander highly, refers people to my group who have had other options failed, and also recommends my book highly.
I note that you avoid addressing the three actual oleander sites I provided links to, the same as you conveniently failed to address the actual case reports I provided links to.
The Anvirzel Phase I trial was a very short duration trial whose only purpose was to determine maximum dose (none was found). Phase I trials usually do note any anti-tumor activity; however the trial for Anvirzel only lasted for a few weeks and, as noted here repeatedly, oleander does not work overnight. In fact, I repeatedly advise people to look for other additional options when they have but scant weeks estimated time left.
The Yahoo question you posted was found to come from a troll whose lack of knowledge about oleander was thoroughly exposed - and who had several questions deleted. Besides his previous posts which clearly indicated no knowledge at all of oleander, he also hung himself with the above question because oleander was not available as a supplement six years prior to his post.
Did you happen to note whose answer was chosen as the best one?
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1770619