CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: Sutherlandia opc conclusion? by Hveragerthi ..... CureZone Moderators Debate and Complaints

Date:   2/15/2011 11:26:27 PM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   455
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1770539

0 of 3 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

 Oleander, together with the suggestions found in A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol has been shown to be highly effective in addressing cancer.  Taking into account the people that have been treated in South Africa by Dr. Marc Swanepoel and those members in our private yahoo forum, it has been determined to be 90% effective in Stage I and II cancers and 85% effective in Stages III and IV.  Our yahoo group, Oleandersoup, has over 2,000 members and has been in existence for six years.  Let me point out that we still have original members.  We have members that are now cancer free and continue to do well while still leading a healthy lifestyle.  This is paramount in healing from cancer and keeping it from returning.

And yet no human studies have been presented despite multiple requests for such evidence.  The problem is that anyone can make up unsubstantiated claims.  MLM companies do it all the time.  Like the one that claimed the oldest lived people in the world are in the Himalayas where they attribute the long life to glacial water minerals.  Of course that is not true.  Then there is the one about the oldest lived people live in Okinawa where they attribute their long life to minerals from coral.  And again that is not true.  So again, people make up numbers like a 90% cure rate all the time.  This DOES NOT make it true.  This is why I have asked for REAL evidence over and over from the same person who has demanded the same from me.  Where is the evidence to the claimed cure rate from credible sources?


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1770539