CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: what Hv does not understand about CZ. by spudlydoo ..... Liver Flush Debate Forum

Date:   1/16/2011 4:50:16 AM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   7,103
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1753513

1 of 6 (16%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Its interesting how people want proof that vaccines are not harmful, they want proof that the food, that is said to be organic, is what it's producers claim it is. People want proof that herbal medicines work, and they want proof that supplementing with iodine, does in fact do what the proponents claim it does. They want proof that the people they vote for believe the same things they do, and will do their best for their constituents, they want proof that the products they buy and the companies that produce them, are everything that they are claimed to be. People want proof that climate change is happening, and that polluting our planet is destroying it, even though they ignore the evidence, they still demand it. Scientific evidence no less.

They want proof/evidence, before they will believe anything. But, when it comes to liver flushing, people are expected not to ask for any proof/evidence that these flushes actually do what they are claimed too. As long as you feel better, its all ok.

If you do ask for some proof, that this protocol actually does what people claim it does, this is seen as upsetting, and trying to destroy the Liver Flush Forum , you are insulted, called a troll, a shill, and numerous other nasty names. This wouldn't be necessary if there was any truth to the claims that the proponents of this protocol make, the results would have been proven long ago.

It seems that some believe that Liver Flushes should just be pushed to all who visit CZ without any reference or care, for those people who may do great harm, doing a protocol, for which there is no evidence of it actually doing what it is claimed to do.

This is hypocrisy, it is unethical, and it shows a distinct lack of conscience. People need to be fully informed, and part of that information, is evidence, that is independently verifiable. People should also be fully informed of the possible dangers.

If people are not fully informed, then the people who push this protocol are no better than the pharmaceutical companies that they rail against.


spud


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1753513