Date:   1/15/2011 2:58:34 AM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   7,255
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1752999

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

 Hv, I took the "stones" that I collected, after doing the liver flush protocol, to a university lab. There the students were given the task of identifying what the stones were. 10 students were given the task, and none of them, or the Professor, came to the conclusion that these were gallstones.

This was done for free, because it was used as a learning tool. I explained the protocol to the Professor, and the students were simply given the task of identifying the chemical makeup of the "stones". This way the results would not be influenced by the student's personal views, (if they had any), on this protocol.

The "stones" turned out to be exactly what you have been describing, soap stones, formed in the intestine, by the ingredients of the flush, and bile.

Yep, fecal soaps are a well known fact of biology.  It does not require potassium or sodium hydroxide and a stove as some people want to make it sound like is required for soap formation.

If the OP, is a student, then it should be very easy for him to get the "stones" analysed at the university he is a student at.

Now that is the solid evidence I am talking about.  You would think that if the liver flush supporters really believed in the flushes that they would provide some type of solid evidence to back their claims.  Instead they ignore requests for evidence or use the old it is out there somewhere, go look for it tactic.  I can't even get this person to describe their "stones" to me since I will be able to point out all the characteristics that do not fit real gallstones.  There is a simple way to determine if they are real stones or not, but I am waiting for the description first so they don't change their story to fit what I say.

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1752999