Date:   1/14/2011 3:14:45 PM ( 13 y ago)
Hits:   7,200
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1752783

1 of 3 (33%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

 i will preempt the anti flush brigade with some science...

More subtle insults.

you said you had 4 avocados, and that was what prompted your flush.

4 avocados would yield (and i am being extremely generous) about .25 grams of sterol content each. so you ingested approximately 1 gram of plant sterol in your food.

1 gram is equivalent to .03 ounces.

A PENNY WEIGHS 2.5 GRAMS!!!!!!!!!!

and yet you dumped hundreds if not thousands of stones.

But wait, you said in your earlier post that people tend to exaggerate their number of stones after it was pointed out that the gallbladder cannot hold that many stones.  Now you are changing your story because you need to in oder to fit your needs.  Tsk, tsk, tsk.....

how will the flush brigade account for such a gross mismatch in accounting?

hmmm, let's see, on one hand we have .03 ounces of sterol and on the other hand a toilet bowl full of stones. something is not adding up here if we buy into the 'soap stone' theory.

nice try guys, but it looks like the math is doing you in once again.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!   Nice try Lisamarie but you are leaving out so much in a deliberate attempt to mislead.  First of all you fail to mention how much cholesterol can be bound by a single sterol molecule.  You are assuming a 1:1 ratio.  But science is not always that straight forward.  One molecule of peroxide can take out thousands of cancer cells.  Gums can absorb hundreds to thousands of times their own volume of water.  A single atom like nitrogen can bind with multiple other atoms such as in the case of NH₄.  So you already lost hat part of the debate by failing to do your homework and prove a 1:1 binding ratio.

Secondly, you deliberately left out the fact that saponification is a natural occurrence in the body.  Especially when large amounts of fat are ingested leading to more bile being dumped.   This has been explained to you over and over and proven over and over.  So it is clear that you deliberately left this out since again you had to in order to fit your needs of misleading people again.  This was a great example though of the typical canned responses of the LF supporters since they have NO REAL EVIDENCE to come back with.  So they rely instead on misleading claims and diversion tactics.  Luckily the newbies coming here will see tight through these games and will realize that there is no real evidence to back liver flushing, which is why the supporters rely on games instead of evidence.  Keep up the good work Lisamarie.  You are doing a great service to the community by scaring people away from this quackery.

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1752783