Date:   12/28/2010 9:21:34 PM ( 14 y ago)
Hits:   7,755
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1744078

1 of 2 (50%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

More assumptions from you, and no evidence.

How is my evidence biased? This is your assumption, where is your evidence to back this assumption?

I performed the liver flushes, after making certain that I did not have any gallstones, that could be lodged in the bile duct. I did this because I did not want the possibility of having to have emergency surgery.

I did produce "stones" from doing these flushes, which were the same as those described by many others. These were not gall stones or liver stones , but the result of the chemical reactions of the Liver Flush ingredients and bile. These "stones" were formed in the intestine, and did not come from the gallbladder or liver.

It is not a matter of belief or bias, it is simply biological fact, and what people want to believe does not change the facts.

spud
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1744078