Re: differences between Blood Cleaner and Zappers by parazapper ..... Zapper Support Forum
Date: 11/17/2010 9:24:51 PM ( 14 y ago)
Hits: 11,214
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1725971
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
It is a fallacy to take the theories of any one individual as gospel.
>- Beck has chosen AC 4Hz only to avoid electrolysis.
The Beck devices that I have seen are differential DC output which appears as AC square wave on an oscilloscope. This does reduce electrolysis but does not completely eliminate the effects. Also, the frequency does not matter. The reduction of electrolysis occurs at other, higher frequencies as well.
>- You try to think about Beck BE using Clark's logic, that is wrong
Actually, not. The Beck output is still basically a square wave with harmonic frequencies despite Beck's theoretical claims.
>- But looking from straight Beck's point of view, frequency simply does not matter, amount of current does.
While this is his point of view, it is not all that counts. Current? Yes, that is the very point of the CCa. More current. But Frequency is still most important. If frequency was not important, Why did Beck not choose 3 Hz? 5Hz?
As proof, I offer the following. Try using a 4 Hz pure sine wave as a Blood Electrifier. It works very poorly. It is the sharp rise time of the leading edge that is most important with the sharp falling of the trailing edge that gives rise to the odd harmonics that counts most. The milder the slope. the lower the effectiveness.
>- From Beck perspective the effectiveness of Clarks devices depends only of amount of current delivered into blood.
This is because Beck was only thinking in regards to the Blood. I am thinking in regards to reaching all parts of an organism. Beck used small electrodes stratigically placed to concentrate his signal int the blood. I prefer large strategically placed electrodes to provide maximum coverage.
I submit the following:
If a zapper does not reach the intestines, why do some users of certain zapper/electrode combinations have to replenish their intestinal flora. Yes, they have to or they will suffer from not doing so. Why have several reported passing Tapeworms including the scolex as well as other kinds of worms after zapping but not taking herbs or anything else.
It is too bad that the FDA has infringed me from publishing my data.
>- "The most reasonable theory of why electrification is so surprisingly effective for so many conditions lies in the now-proven fact that when correctly applied directly into blood (not into other body tissue like palms of hands, soles of feet, or organs) it neutralizes all microbes, pathogens, fungi, parasites, viruses, bacteria, mycotoxins and coexisting foreign lifeforms and alien invaders and their byproducts.
Only in the blood. Then you have to add the pulser, coloidal silver, etc.
>- Clark’s “syncro zap" running
Yes, I have one and it has a very weak output unlike some of the "Alfa Romeo" models. Also, I have never felt that 30 kHs was the best choice by a long shot. The SynchroZap is a poor example and would only be chosen as an example by someone with an agenda with many better models available from several manufcturers. Of course, it was probably the best available when Beck was still with us.
>- Robert Beck was rather sceptical about zappers effectiveness.
Again, if he was looking at the SynchroZap or similar models, I understand entirely. I will say that he never examined the CCa with copper paddles and augmentation footpads nor did he test the MX, the MF, or the AV. I too was very skeptical of the SynchroZap and that is why I mande my own zapper and then started selling them.
Both Clark and Beck had their ideas. I have used both and expanded on them as have some others.
Do not take my words as gospel either but I definitely can not agree with some of your post because I have spent a lot of time experimenting and find that neither is entirely correct. Opinions are just that, they are not fact and are not indisputable.
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1725971