Re: Law 101 by ChaztheMeatHead ..... Conspiracy Forum
Date: 7/25/2010 11:05:43 AM ( 15 y ago)
Hits: 10,305
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1659278
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
I just wanted to give an example of how you have to read the whole law including definitions and exceptions to understand what they're saying. This is from the governments own US code web site: http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/50C32.txt
This is the title.
"TITLE 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM
-HEAD-
Sec. 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents"
Now this is what the statute (Code word for meaningless illegal "law") says about this program.
"-STATUTE-
(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract) -
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects."
Sounds good huh? The defense system may not conduct chemical or biological tests on the population or individual humans right? Wrong.
When you read the exceptions, you find out the conditions under which they CAN do experiments on the population and individual humans.
"(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control."
Notice first that they have to meet the requirements in "(c), (d), and (e)"? We'll address this after going through the rest of this section first.
So they can do experiments on humans if they meet (c), (d), and (e), for "medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity." Hmm research activity? That's a wide open door. And they can do experiments for "Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents." AND "any purpose related to riot control." So this basically says they can do any kind of research they want as long as they meet the (c), (d), and (e) requirements.
Now look at the requirements of (c), (d), and (e), that they have to meet to do these experiments.
"(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
(d) Prior notice to Congress
Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees.
(e) "Biological agent" defined
In this section, the term "biological agent" means any micro- organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing -
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment."
Now let's look at section (c). It says they can do these experiment "only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject."
There is no definition for informed consent. Remember I said you have to look for the things they don't say too. The consent doesn't have to be in writing. They could just say, Would you be willing to do a simple test? They could just say, Come on we're going to do a test on you. And if the person doesn't disagree, they consented. There is no guide lines for obtaining "consent". The department could even say they got consent since nothing is in writing. Does it say anyone will be held responsible for anything? This is a wide open door too.
Now let's go onto section (d). It basically says they have to inform Congress not later than 30 days after drawing up the plan and can start conducting the experiment 30 days after submitting their plans. Notice there is no approval required from Congress? The only restriction is a waiting period. And I'm sure Congress monitors this to make sure they wait too. And I'm sure this system would catch and back dating too.
Then section (e) defines what a Biological agent is. Notice there is no definition for chemical weapons? They could be anything. But it says it could basically kill or damage any human, animal, plant, any living organism, food, water, equipment, supplies, any kind of material or the environment. So a biological agent could be anything that damages or kills anything.
So basically this statute (meaningless illegal garbage) says they can do what ever they want, to who ever they want and to anything they want with biological or chemical agents. Nothing more. Is it a law? Hell no.
But see how statutes, codes, regulations, infractions offences and so on, are colors of law? These things are no more than some form of government declaring they're going to harm you in some other way again. They look official or legal, but they is nothing legal about them. They aren't based on Constitutioanl law. They don't follow the supreme law of doing no harm or was there harm done. In fact these "laws" DO HARM in some way EVERY TIME. Every one of them makes someone pay either financially or physically. This is why RAP is going to abolish all this illegal garbage.
By standing on the higher ground of being a sovereign American and making them prove harm, and not letting them make you wavier from this, you can make all their stupid "laws" disappear into the void from which they came. And there are several ways to make this happen.
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.05 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1659278