Date:   6/21/2010 2:14:23 AM ( 14 y ago)
Hits:   16,923
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1640710

1 readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Thanks for the comments, but you are in a chemistry "box" that you cannot see out of. The technology used in xxx is not confined to your "box". As long as you remain in that "box", there is nothing that I can say to convince you of the errors in your comments.

The size of the particle in xxx is the size of 3 Oxygen atoms COVALENTLY BONDED to 1 atom of Silver, and the minute Hydrogen. It is stablized. It is non-photosensitive! Its provided in clear bottles and does not break down in water.

This is the most advanced technology and backed by a $1,000,000 reward, in gold, for superior safety and efficacy. You are welcome to take the challenge, but if you fail you owe the owner a whopping $1M in gold.

"Larger than colloidal silver" you say? What size is colloidal silver? Obviously it varies in size, and that makes your statement erroneous.

Your biggest error is taking the silver oxide ASSUMPTION and running with it as if it is factual in describing anything to do with xxx. You make several erroneous assumptions and build a strawman full of hype that you fabricate yourself.

Retired government officials, one of which has endoresed it as the best silver product they have ever tested in the world, and who does not make such claims without validating it with the best research methods available knows what he is endorsing.

Twisting the Warburg quote earns you no credibility either, and neither does you comparison of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy, as their is no comparison to what is going on in the cell with the xxx particle.

Is that the best you've got? If so, then no sense in wasting time explaining it to you. Best of luck, though, on getting up to speed with the technical aspects of the subject matter.

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1640710