CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: which came first, the allergies or the disease? (edited) by Hveragerthi ..... The Truth in Medicine

Date:   5/12/2010 12:32:49 AM ( 15 y ago)
Hits:   5,383
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1621167

 So the shots are not fixing the underlying problem, they are masking the underlying problem. Again the underlying cause is adrenal dysfunction.

When your immune system is weak and overworking, attacking every kind of pollen, mold, dander and foreign object- creating inflammation, headache, insomnia, and havoc in the body- how can you build your adrenals up?

You have to eat anyway so why not foods rich in vitamin C, B vitamins and maybe even quercetin. Then there adaptogenic herbs. In addition avoiding things that suppress the adrenals such as caffeine. 

That's the whole point of the shots, to give your adrenals a rest and let them heal.

And again this is an area I disagree with. I don't see them giving the adrenals a break. They are stimulating antibody production, which again is regulated by the adrenals. So the injection of these antigens is still making the adrenals work.

And they do work because immediately you're relieved of allergies and asthma, and after 4 or 5 years, with proper care (good nutrition and less stress), the immune system and adrenals are healed. BTW, the needles are insulin size needles-very small 29 guage.

There is still a reason we have a barrier to outside substances we call the skin. To deliberately puncture that protective barrier to inject foreign substances just does not make a lot of sense to me.

What about the preservatives and who knows what that are in these shots?

This is a real concern to me. I asked for antigens without preservatives and they said I'd have to be allergic to the preservative because they're very expensive without it. I've heard about people getting allergy shots for 10-20 years with no side effects, but those were hyper-allergic children with life threatening allergies. I'm still researching that issue, so I'd really appreciate hearing anything you know.

One problem is that side effects are not always attributed to their source. When someone dies from chemotherapy this is not listed as the cause, the cancer is. When someone has a stroke or heart attacks from taking ibuprofen the cause of death is listed as stoke or heart attack, not a side effect of the ibuprofen............

And look at what happened with the polio vaccines we received back in the 60s. The vaccine was contaminated with the simian virus type 40 (SV40), known to cause various cancers, including brain cancer, after 25+ years. This is thought to be the cause of the sudden surge in brain cancer cases over the last decade.

I just talked to the girl who gives me the shots and she said she'd save the inserts for me. She said the antigens have glycerol in them as a preservative, but the saline water has phenol in it, and the bottles of antigens have a 1/20 ratio with saline water. How dangerous is thisamount of phenol?www.hollisterstier.com/allergy/allergycatalog.aspx

I think it would depend a lot on the phenol. There is not a singular phenol. Bisphenol A is a phenol that everyone is worried about it plastics. Would you want them injecting Bispehol A directly in to your bloodstream for example?

Isn't this the same saline water they put in bags of IVs?They put phenol in the small viles of saline water because it's used mulitple times, so hopefully, the big bags of saline water for IVs don't have preservatives.

Yes, it is the same saline, but there should be no preservatives since the saline is packaged sterile.


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1621167