Date:   1/21/2010 3:58:25 PM ( 14 y ago)
Hits:   5,094
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1558567

I'm thinking out loud here.

It can be very confusing, because it's like this article is talking about with it not being a vitamin, but a hormone-steroid, it is also talking about how the liver and kidneys process it.

http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/otherendo/vitamind.html


With my calcium and magnesium literally being so high they were off the charts on my hair test, I know that's another piece of the puzzle, and parathyroid/thyroid is involved.

But while the calcium and magnesium show so high, what it's showing is that they are not being able to be used by the body like they need to be, so it's a deficiency problem and yet at the same time, they are toxic. (biounavailable).

That's what I'm wondering about with what seems to be everyone with the Vitamin D being found to be a deficiency. IS it actually a deficiency? Or is the type of testing being done, showing it as a deficiency, while the actual cause is that it is also biounavailable and toxic too?

And, how much of a role does the heavy metals toxicity play in all of this too, because if the liver and kidneys are the two organs that do the synthesizing of the D, and the liver pathways are messed up from the metals, then it's not going to be processed through the liver like it needs to be either.

Plus..although Lead didn't show up as a problem on my hair test, it showed as an extremely high problem on the urine metals test I did. Lead interferes with the absorption of calcium in the bones...but if small intestines have damage (parasites, celiac etc), calcium is not absorbed either. If thyroid/parathyroid regulate calcium, and D- metals, and fluoride, interfere with that process too.

http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/thyroid/calcium.html



 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1558567