Re: Killing resistant microbes hiding in remote protected areas with zappers by MZap ..... Zapper Support Forum
Date: 9/1/2009 10:56:48 AM ( 15 y ago)
Hits: 3,088
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1482610
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
IMPORTANT POST!
This Parazapper post is so important, I will recommend you to print-it and include-it in your zapper’s manual.
I found another Parazapper's post (with no comments) I suggest to include too, into your manual :
//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1424145#i
From a slight different point of view…
1) Frequency. Fully agree. If 2 frequencies are a better choice than a single one, and 8 or 16 even much better, imagine too 200! (;-)
Working on a 250 frequency zapper...
2) Voltage. Fully agree. Even if sometimes 3V is enough, being able to count on a constant supply of around 10V is a peace of mind in zapper’s use. Do not forget that what makes a zapper “work”, is current at destination, and not voltage at the zapper’s output.
3) Current. Fully agree. This issue is a safety point quite often overlooked by many.
I consider 8mA of PEAK current as the top safest limit on a zapper.
Be careful : Peak current, Average current and RMS current have different meanings.
3a) Until now, only one zapper (to my acknowledge, CCa) has current control, and a variable output. This could change in a next, close future.
3b) Applied power. Fully agree.
“ (but not exceeding it)” This is a major concern, when you want to keep your customers alive and happy (:-)
There is another factor, normally included with current in the formula P=EI under “I” : Time exposure.
Because we cannot exceed a current limit, Power used on the “load” is limited too.
The effect of electricity in human body (I believe this is true for a zapper too) is determined by the quantity of electrical charges at destination.
This amount depends on the current flowing AND the time of exposure.
Q (quantity) = I (current) x t (time)
See this link for more explanations.
http://www.emz.maestro-zapper.com/e_how_it_works.html#CCM-Annexe1
If current is limited to obtain a positive result, time is fully under our control.
This is why it is VERY important to zap long enough and often enough (inside some limits, here too).
If you have access to a less powerful zapper, and your time is not counted (You are not dying), results will be longer, but most of the time you will have results.
4) Rise time. Again, fully agree! Rise and Fall time are two specifications (almost) nobody talks about. Thanks, Mr Parazapper.
These factors indicates the maximum frequency a square wave signal has in its harmonics, when you want to use-them.
A 555 oscillator is just right for a use as a zapper, thanks to fast enough (and not too fast neither) rise time and fall time.
Interesting enough, I have seen many zappers using coiled output cables. In electronic (Radio, TV), we use coils to stop High Frequencies, and some use-them on zappers where these High frequencies are welcome. Weird!
5 & 6) Application time. Fully agreed - on a regular basis.
Each person and application can be a different history, out of regular basis, specially when using a zapper for the first time.
My personal experience suggest me to use a zapper for a minimum time of 3mn, 7mn is good, 30mn is even better (inside a sequence having rest times of 20mn to 1h) and taking in account the capacity of the person to get rid of all these “bad little beggars” all at once.
Understanding zapping specifications permits a better choice and use of our zapper.
Enjoy your zapping!
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1482610