I agree...and would like to add...Re: Lots of "Science" is "unscientific." by unyquity ..... Natural Healing & Herbal Solutions w/Unyquity
Date: 5/21/2009 8:51:27 AM ( 16 y ago)
Hits: 2,191
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1423408
--Even when "science" is TOTALLY pure (no agenda whatsoever), it's still based on the knowledge we have TODAY...and that knowledge WILL change tomorrow :(
For example, we've all read endless 'scientific data' on what is actually good for the liver and how to heal it...but "science" (both 'alternative' and 'typical') still can NOT clearly define the myriads of intricacies & unknown functions of the liver (or kidneys, or brain). And what 'science' DOES know and advise about the liver (or any organ or system of organs), is based many times (where applicable for infectious disease) on Pasteur's erroneous "germ theory", and is NOT based on the action or presence of somatids and/or pleomorphism (see below)...nor do the typical 'healing sciences' adequately take into account that all systems/organs are symbiotically dependent in some way on all the others (let alone the myriad of effects of environmental toxins/poisons and genetically modified "food").
--For the most part (again, even when "pure") the physical sciences don't take into account the "energy" (and or spiritual & emotional/mental) aspects of life & health in general. Bruce Lipton (PhD) "The Biology of Belief" is a fantastic read in this regard.
--Even without unpure motives, the majority of 'scientific' research (especially regarding contagious diseases & pathogens) are based upon Pasteur's Germ Theory...which has been shown to be wrong - and Pasteur himself admitted the same on his deathbed. Basically: 'Germs don't cause disease, anymore than mosquitoes cause a pond to be stagnant'. It's because the pond/body is stagnant that the "germs" proliferate to the point of causing symptoms.
--Pleomorphism is something that no pure/true "scientist" could deny if they researched it fully - yet much of our 'human science' is founded on the "fact" that all microorganisms remain the same throughout their life span.
(Pleomorphism means, many or more (pleo-), forms or bodies (morph-). Pleomorphism describes the process by which microorganisms (bacteria, various cells, parasites) change from one form to another within the human body)
--Lastly, known most recently as somatids, we have what is basically an "unknown to science" tiny life form (undetectable with today's typical microscopes) upon which our ENTIRE body is symbiotically dependent. When "science" won't admit or recognize the presence of somatids (or their effect on our body), ALL of their work & research becomes essentially as invalid as denying the fact that we have white & red blood cells, and immune & lymphatic cells...and then basing their research upon that untruth.
So, for "science" regarding the human body and illness to be "sound", it would have to:
-- be "pure" (in motive & intent)
-- meet all of Grzbears criteria
-- include all aspects of 'energy' and it's effects
-- have full knowledge of the function of each organ separately AND full knowledge of how each organ/system interacts with the other/s (which will likely never happen in our lifetime)
-- address the effect of chemical toxins/gmo's on the terrain of the body (and on each individual organ/system)
-- address the fact that the 'germ theory' is a falsehood
-- AND include as it's fundamental baseline the truth of somatids & pleomorphism (which most of 'science' doesn't even recognize).
Until that happens, it seems to me that ALL "science" as it regards the human body, is seriously questionable....that is, unless what they taught me in grade school about how to determine the validity of ANYTHING "scientific" was ALSO a lie. :::sigh:::
Let truth & freedom reign -
Unyquity
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.03 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1423408