Date:   11/28/2008 12:27:39 PM ( 16 y ago)
Hits:   10,566
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1307113

My sister who had a small lobular cancer tumor in one of her breasts recently had a thermal scan of her entire body. She had a lumpectomy when they found the tumor but no other conventional treatment. Just nutritional/supplemental interventions. It has been about 2+ years. She feels fine. The doctor said there was a small area on the other breast that she sould have an ultrasound or mri on. The other part of the report we didn't understand. It said there was increased vascularity in both breasts likely due to phytoestrogens. I'm not sure that she has been taking pytoestrogens but she took Premarin back before the tests came out showing how dangerous they were. The report indicated that the increased vascularity was a risk, a bad thing.

I don't get it. The test results report said it resembled the vascularity of a 20 something.

Why is that bad? I personally just started taking (about 3 months ago) bioidentical estrogen, progesterone and testosterone and DHEA. I was physically a mess before I started this regimen from the loss of hormones at menopause. I feel great now. Of course the breasts are going to be stimulated and resemble younger breasts with increased vascularity. Do you see that as a cancer risk for my sister who has had cancer or myself, (and I haven't had cancer)?

Thank You

Thanks
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1307113