Re: Moderating: a question of balance by Raine13 ..... Fasting: Debate
Date: 10/31/2008 6:50:15 AM ( 17 y ago)
Hits: 6,533
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1289194
2 of 3 (66%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
better to simply be a good contributor (as you, Chris, always were)and bow out
of the moderating.(imv Let the Webmaster assign (or not!) someone who's willing
to be anonymous: a wise and sensible state that has been seen to be the preferred choice, after years of witnessing human nature unfold.
Chiron, I respect you and value your posts; however, on this one issue I have to respectfully disagree.
When Steve & Chris were appointed as moderators, the vast majority of the frequent posters were delighted with this info - who better to moderate the forum to ensure proper information was going out about water fasting than the 2 who have so openly given of their time and advice and are living examples of the benefits of water fasting.
It was not until the recent attacks by 2 members of this forum on Chris that this even became an issue. The hard cold truth is that according to CZ rules, they have intentionally argued with a moderator and as such are subject to banning because such activity disrupts the forum.
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1289194