Date:   4/7/2008 11:42:27 PM ( 16 y ago)
Hits:   2,049
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1149545

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Ya know, Icky, if certain demographics are becoming sincerely interested in the idea of survival, that's great no matter what the motivation. No matter who the people are and no matter what walk of life they come from, it doesn't (or shouldn't) matter if some of them are coming to do so out of some sense they have for wanting to join a trend to pursue with a sense of stylishness.

After browsing that Times piece, the clues suggest there may be no other logical nexus for certain demographics, no other practical way to interest them in surviving the same turbulent times many of them have previously spent so much time and energy deriding as "paranoid theory".

The clues begin with what passes as nuggets of survivalist wisdom emanating from the likes of a "former chief global strategist of Morgan Stanley", who's short list of survival gear includes wine. Even in America and Europe there could be moments of riot and rebellion when law and order temporarily completely breaks down.” Supposing that law & order does completely break down, one must wonder what rational basis there is to imply such would be temporary, not permanent. It is not difficult to imagine this former muckety muck is not that far removed from the grade of beknighted individuals "leaders" who've already carved out lavish, taxpayer-funded, fully-furnished, well-stocked, hidey-hole, underground "survival" bunkers - which are actually miniature cities, where they plan to bravely wait out catastrophe occurring above ground. To even mention these openly of course immediately enters the realm of "conspiracy theory". Nonetheless, there is ample evidence these kinds of survival bunkers literally litter the underground spaces of this country from coast to coast.  The clues continue upon considering the typical litany of lingo served up by those among the most  hardened reality phobes against "conspiracy theorists".

Survivalism, it seems, is not just for survivalists anymore....people who do not consider themselves extremists are starting to discuss doomsday measures once associated with the social fringes....in case the future turns out like something out of “An Inconvenient Truth,” if not “Mad Max.” “I’m not a gun-nut, camo-wearing skinhead. I don’t even hunt or fish....Still, motivated by a belief that the credit crunch and a bursting housing bubble might spark widespread economic chaos (DUH) ..“If all these planets line up and things do get really bad,” .... At times, a degree of paranoia is officially sanctioned.....Esteemed economists debate whether the credit crisis could result in a complete meltdown of the financial system (DUH) ......Alex Steffen, the executive editor of www.Worldchanging.com, a Web site devoted to sustainability (code speak for globalist's warming agenda)  said the chaos following Hurricane Katrina served as a wake-up call for him and others that the government might not be able to protect them in an emergency or environmental crisis. (DUH) .....Some middle-class preparedness converts, like Val Vontourne, a musician and paralegal in Olympia, Wash., recoil at the term “survivalist,” even as they stock their homes with food, gasoline and water. “I think of survivalists as being an extreme case of preparedness,” said Ms. Vontourne, 44, “people who stockpile guns and weapons, anticipating extreme aggression. Whereas what I’m doing, I think of as something responsible people do....the same way I think of buying health insurance and putting money in my 401k,”

Upon considering the sentiment housed in that collection of lingo it is not so difficult to imagine how or why it takes the fashion section of a big city newspaper to serve as an iconic, rallying front for the kinds of personalities attached to such mainstream, jingoistic sentiment and intellect. According to the Times, some among this target sector did not know much at all, apparently, about how survive until somebody wrote the general ideas into a book. All along they had been taking their survival tips and queues from popular culture, namely Hollywood as well as other novelists who have created for this sector their very own brand of unmitigated, actual conspiracy theories featuring Al and his merry, global green band of gloomy, inconvenient lies, to the ruse of Peak Oil. During the past 20 years, what other outlets aside from the usual suspects in tv, big screen, and printing houses have been programming people to the notion that survival is a concept only for extremists stockpiling guns and weapons in anticipation of extreme aggression?  You wanna talk about an inconvenient truth? How inconvenient do you suppose it is for the average upwardly mobile to confront the decision to make preparations for surviving the kind of dilemma that they have in large part spent the past decade vociferously denying? Mainstream and pop culture have given them their own brand of middle-ground theory to cling to. A stylish approach to same may help to soothe the pains of inconvenience. Even if it doesn't, more people investing in survival is no doubt good for the sagging economy :)

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1149545