CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: zapper vs electronic muscle stimulators by Five ..... Zapper Debate

Date:   6/21/2006 11:16:35 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   14,070
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=107672

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Thank you all for the interesting info. It is good to find knowledgeable people when you need them.
I have another question and probably more forthcoming.
I have 2 zappers. One is the Terminator, which I like. I don't often have problems, so can't write a lot about it. This one has 2 copper pennies for electrodes. This one says it is 15 HZ. It measures 4.5 volts. I do notice that when my skin is moist it does sting and become extremely uncomfortable.

I also have a "pet zapper". I have used it on myself. This one says it is 28 HZ.
I had a problem with it. I developed a nasty ringworm around the Positive electrode. I had been sitting on the floor petting the dog before I used it.

I have read that when using magnets you should always use the Negative side because the Positive side makes things grow.
I have also read this in other electrotharapy info that I have been reading. Positive makes things grow.

Therefore, I do not understand the insistence in the info on Hulda Clark 's Zappers to use this "Positive" offset. Perhaps I misunderstand. Does this mean "Positive off (Negative on)?

Is there any reason why the Clark Zappers do not offer adhesive electrode pads (there are reusable ones)? Being tied down with her setup is a huge turn off to both purchasing them and using them.

That schematic for building your own is limited to those who can read it. In her first book she gave easy to follow instructions, and I did build one, except that I used the Radio Shack board instead of having that jungle of wires.

I wonder how hard it is to make unit that would be have a wider range of variation starting with the Microcurrents, and having an attachment that could be used as an Electro Accupunture unit, as well as the attribute of Clark's best with optional adhesive electrode pads.

It just seems to me that they are not putting out their very best efforts, and therefore are missing the opportunity to hit more "bugs" with one "stone", as well as expanding their market share and making more money.



 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=107672