Date:   11/29/2007 8:54:20 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   5,156
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1051858

1 readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

MH,

You must have struck a deep cord of insecurity over there. They are all running around like blind pigeons trying to peck crumbs on the street in order to defend their lugol's.


http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1051469#i


I suspect they care very much what you think or they wouldn't even bother commenting on it. This tells me they are unsure themselves of this therapy. Otherwise, why would they be concerned about what a country herbalist thinks???

I've experimented heavily with lugol's over that last month and have come to the conclusion its very individual whether it has any therapeutic value, and it certainly has some very dangerous/unwanted potentials. And that "value" is very debatable as to what is actually occurring. Am I really purging unwanted toxins and am I really correctly saturating the tissues that need it? Nobody really knows. And no, you cannot accurately evaluate this with pissing into a cup. These are flawed medical tools of the trade based on assumptions. You cannot safely recommend dosages or a supplementation protocol of iodine to anyone, which makes their forum very problematic in my opinion.

There are so many other factors involved as to whether you get the desired effects you are looking for. Each person's life or health blueprint is as complex and unique as a fingerprint. Given that, I think I now understand why some people give up on natural forms so easily. Natural forms will not work well if you do not correct diet, alkalinity, blood, balance, etc in the body. This may take months of dedication for some.

The lugol zealots are like every other drug addict. They want/need instantaneous results. In other words, the lazy goose. They want one magic potion that works immediately while not necessarily correcting other lifestyle problems. My guess is some of them will supplement on inorganic iodine for the rest of their lives. So that begs the question: How can that be the correct approach to health? This is like the fallacy that women need to take synthetic calcium the rest of their lives to prevent osteoporosis. It doesn't fundamentally make sense to me.

I don't care if some people have "cured" cancers with lugol's. It doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it safe. And is it really a cure? They throw all sorts of MD research at you to say its 100% true. I say the verdict is still out and my guess is their cancer will eventually come back despite iodine. People have "cured" cancers with chemo and radiation, and I could provide tons of web links to support/argue that the so-called "therapy" is safe and effective. We would all agree it isn't and stats/medical lie about this. They are no different than this, but they don't see it (typical addict). They are lost in the hype.

Supplementing with lugol's or idoral is simply another allopathic approach that attempts to medicate (instead of educate) and lure you into a false sense of good. It is not the be-all, end-all shield of defense against illness. Long-term use cannot be good for the body; and for some people it could be very dangerous in the short-term. Just my opinions.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.00 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1051858