Date:   10/1/2005 9:54:24 PM ( 20 y ago)
Hits:   3,395
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=105149

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

>>>>>I would suggest changing the name to the Andy Cutler Protocol-Stephen Hawking Project to further emphasize that Andy Cutler himself is not associated with nor supports this project.

Done

>>>>>I think someone with a long-standing disease that is neuromuscular in nature is a poor subject for an attempt to showcase the merits of the Cutler protocol. I think the possibility of reversing decades long neurological damage is next to zero.

I disagree! I know mainstream medicine claims that neurone damage can't be fixed but that's actually not true. Doctors just don't know how to reverse it and therefor say it's permanent. Well, from their perspective that's actually true.

>>>>>Do you have evidence of any other cases of long-term ALS cases that have improved from the Cutler protocol?

We personally don't have any, but maybe Andy Cutler does. However, there are many cases where people with ALS got better after only removing their Amalgam fillings. So you see, neurone damage can be fixed.

>>>>>Picking someone as well-known as Mr. Hawking for this project will only make any failure to improve that much better publicized. This will not help make the case for Amalgam toxicity or Andy Cutler's protocol.

We're convinced everything will be okay because Mr. Hawking WILL get cured.

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=105149