The
History and Misconceptions of Dominance Theory
Note:
The information in the following article came from an interview
with Dr. Ian Dunbar, who spent nine years studying the social behavior
of dogs during the study mentioned below. In an earlier version of this
article, Dr. L. David Mech was credited with the 30-year study. This
was a mistake. The researcher who conducted the study was Dr. Frank
Beach. An effort has been made to correct this error. However, if you
know of a place where the original article was published, please notify
the editor and request a correction.
The original
alpha/dominance model was born out of short-term studies of wolf packs
done in the 1940s. These were the first studies of their kind. These
studies were a good start, but later research has essentially disproved
most of the findings. There were three major flaws in these studies:
These were
short-term studies, so the researchers concentrated on the most
obvious, overt parts of wolf life, such as hunting. The studies are
therefore unrepresentative -- drawing conclusions about "wolf behavior"
based on about 1% of wolf life.
The
studies observed what are now known to be ritualistic displays and
misinterpreted them. Unfortunately, this is where the bulk of the
"dominance model" comes from, and though the information has been
soundly disproved, it still thrives in the dog training mythos.
For
example, alpha rolls. The early researchers saw this behavior and
concluded that the higher-ranking wolf was forcibly rolling the
subordinate to exert his dominance. Well, not exactly. This is actually
an "appeasement ritual" instigated by the SUBORDINATE wolf. The
subordinate offers his muzzle, and when the higher-ranking wolf "pins"
it, the lower-ranking wolf voluntarily rolls and presents his belly.
There is NO force. It is all entirely voluntary.
A
wolf would flip another wolf against his will ONLY if he were planning
to kill it. Can you imagine what a forced alpha roll does to the psyche
of our dogs?
.
Finally,
after the studies, the researchers made cavalier extrapolations from
wolf-dog, dog-dog, and dog-human based on their "findings."
Unfortunately, this nonsense still abounds.
So what's the
truth? The truth is dogs aren't wolves. Honestly, when you take into
account the number of generations past, saying "I want to learn how to
interact with my dog so I'll learn from the wolves" makes about as much
sense as saying, "I want to improve my parenting -- let's see how the
chimps do it!"
Dr. Frank
Beach performed a 30-year study on dogs at Yale and UC Berkeley.
Nineteen years of the study was devoted to social behavior of a dog
pack. (Not a wolf pack. A DOG pack.) Some of his findings:
Male dogs
have a rigid hierarchy.
Female
dogs have a hierarchy, but it's more variable.
When you
mix the sexes, the rules get mixed up. Males try to follow their
constitution, but the females have "amendments."
Young
puppies have what's called "puppy license." Basically, that license to
do most anything. Bitches are more tolerant of puppy license than males
are.
The puppy
license is revoked at approximately four months of age. At that time,
the older middle-ranked dogs literally give the puppy hell --
psychologically torturing it until it offers all of the appropriate
appeasement behaviors and takes its place at the bottom of the social
hierarchy. The top-ranked dogs ignore the whole thing.
There is
NO physical domination. Everything is accomplished through
psychological harassment. It's all ritualistic.
A small
minority of "alpha" dogs assumed their position by bullying and force.
Those that did were quickly deposed. No one likes a dictator.
The vast
majority of alpha dogs rule benevolently. They are confident in their
position. They do not stoop to squabbling to prove their point. To do
so would lower their status because...
Middle-ranked
animals squabble. They are insecure in their positions and want to
advance over other middle-ranked animals.
Low-ranked
animals do not squabble. They know they would lose. They know their
position, and they accept it.
"Alpha"
does not mean physically dominant. It means "in control of resources."
Many, many alpha dogs are too small or too physically frail to
physically dominate. But they have earned the right to control the
valued resources. An individual dog determines which resources he
considers important. Thus an alpha dog may give up a prime sleeping
place because he simply couldn't care less.
So what does
this mean for the dog-human relationship?
Using
physical force of any kind reduces your "rank." Only middle-ranked
animals insecure in their place squabble.
To be
"alpha," control the resources. I don't mean hokey stuff like not
allowing dogs on beds or preceding them through doorways. I mean making
resources contingent on behavior. Does the dog want to be fed. Great --
ask him to sit first. Does the dog want to go outside? Sit first. Dog
want to greet people? Sit first. Want to play a game? Sit first. Or
whatever. If you are proactive enough to control the things your dogs
want, *you* are alpha by definition.
Train your
dog. This is the dog-human equivalent of the "revoking of puppy
license" phase in dog development. Children, women, elderly people,
handicapped people -- all are capable of training a dog. Very few
people are capable of physical domination.
Reward
deferential behavior, rather than pushy behavior. I have two dogs. If
one pushes in front of the other, the other gets the attention, the
food, whatever the first dog wanted. The first dog to sit gets treated.
Pulling on lead goes nowhere. Doors don't open until dogs are seated
and I say they may go out. Reward pushy, and you get pushy.
Your job is
to be a leader, not a boss, not a dictator. Leadership is a huge
responsibility. Your job is to provide for all of your dog's needs...
food, water, vet care, social needs, security, etc. If you fail to
provide what your dog needs, your dog will try to satisfy those needs
on his own.
In a recent
article in the Association of Pet Dog Trainers (APDT) newsletter, Dr.
Ray Coppinger -- a biology professor at Hampshire College, co-founder
of the Livestock Guarding Dog Project, author of several books
including Dogs : A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin,
Behavior, and Evolution; and an extremely well-respected member of the
dog training community -- says in regards to the dominance model (and
alpha rolling)...
"I cannot
think of many learning situations where I want my learning dogs
responding with fear and lack of motion. I never want my animals to be
thinking social hierarchy. Once they do, they will be spending their
time trying to figure out how to move up in the hierarchy."
That pretty
much sums it up, don't you think?
Melissa Alexander
mca @ clickersolutions.com
copyright 2001 Melissa C. Alexander