Date:   11/15/2007 2:34:38 PM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   10,261
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1043290

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Thank you for your response. After reading all of the posts between the both of you, I think that your statement that which machine is deemed "better" can depend on the person. This is one statement between both of you that I found to be fair and realistic. Finally.

I also, as a newbie in the area of zapping, can see what you are saying that people could think the UZ is stronger because of the higher voltage.

So far, maybe it is his psychological overt marketing plan by saying over and over and over again that the UZ is the best in the world, I have found myself leaning toward the UZ. In analysis in why, I realize that it is mostly because, well, plain and simple....it looks newer and more advanced technologically.

When I am considering putting electical currents in my body, I find a more advanced model to be quite estethically (sp?) superior, rather than something that looks like it came out of a mental hospital from the early 1900's. However, in contrast, I found it to be quite hilarious to hear Ken say "his" square wave is more squarer than a square wave! Is that science? Ken, you really gotta get the Science down if you want to have the marketing edge over your competitors. It is CRUCIAL if you are going to make these claims about your zapper.

I really have only basic electronic knowledge but know enough to know that a square wave has equal amounts up and down...and anything else is truly NOT a square wave. You can read this in two seconds on a google wikipedia search (which is in fact what I did to remind myself) And you, parazapper, are technically correct in saying that Ken's wave is really NOT a square wave, but is in fact a rectangular wave. As for the odd or even harmoincs either machine emits and it's effectiveness in healing health problems, well, that is way over my head.

However, as a consumer who is looking to buy a product, after HOURS of researching, and reading this post in particular, I have to say that NEITHER of you has really made a good case as to which is more effective and really I just felt that you both just went back and forth for a long time taking out your competitive business frustrations on each other. But that is good too! You guys get it out!

Sadly for me, though, I am still in the same place I was hours ago which is VERY frustrating as a consumer and in fact makes me want to go find a product that is neither the parazapper OR the Ultimate Zapper...which I am sure is completely OPPOSITE of what you were both trying to accomplish.

To be honest even more, I would personally like to see RESEARCHABLE Lab data on both your products before I would rely on any type of person's word as to which is superior. I hope it is ok to share with you, and maybe it will help you to improve the marketing of BOTH of your products.

As it stands right now if I do not find something else, I am leaning toward the UZ, because one, Ken's web-site is much more preofessional and easy to use, two, provides much more health data, and most importantly, I do not want to feel and look like someone receiving electric shock therapy.

I hope that you can both take what I said to heart to improve your businesses. Good luck to both of you!

If either of you decide you would like to have someone be an impartial tester, I would be thrilled to be a part of it. You can email me at attractabundancenow@gmail.com

Thank you..




 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.03 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1043290