Date:   11/9/2007 10:38:00 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   2,328
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1038993

Guess you thought I was going to disagree :)

The SCIO is great; the fault as always lies in perception and operator/training.
All the machine does is ask for body responses to certain frequencies and that can have a few issues just like on some days your thirst response isn’t up to par.

You could be on the way to becoming dehydrated yet not have thirst, so if the SCIO asks “Water” your body says OK (~80) instead of YES (+100)…
In short when it comes to items NOT in the red (very deficient/reactive) there is the requirement for a skilled operator to ask intelligent questions. For the example above the operator could treat the person with water frequency for 3 seconds and check the responds.

Another good way is to keep history of visits, at one point or another one is in the RED for just about all that is important. Being able to keep history like that can help figure things out and of course treat them.

The downfall is that you aren’t going to get any of the above from someone who bought the machine for its money making potential…

That said; I will be buying one ASAP.

BTW: The SCIO will show you underlying issues here and there by bringing stuff up into the RED (reactive) state. It is best to own a frequency generator that can actually treat these issues outside of the session. One recent example was the parvovirus, it was treated with the SCIO and I felt great for about a week. Then things went down hill and by running a CAFL script in the F165 this was all solved again. Even the developer of the SCIO considers a frequency generator a far better organism killer, don’t get me wrong the SCIO does a good job but it works more in a holistic fashion vs. a strong square wave generator.

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1038993