CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: Couric weighs in on Iraq by been there done that ..... Iraq War Debate

Date:   11/5/2007 11:09:58 PM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   3,647
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1036659

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

Minutes after the World Trade Center collapse, it was being broadcasted on the news that it was masterminded by Osama Bin Laden of Afghanistan. Then it was said that Bin Laden was being supported by Saddam Hussein of Iraq. The U.S. had been in Afghanistan for years, so that was the most convenient excuse for invading Iraq.


Our brave soldiers have died pleasing the gods of the White House and will continue to do do so. Many of the survivors have been mamed for life and will spend the rest of their lives with their spouses and their children in a way they would in a nightmare. America has been bankrupted and sold out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About This Video

This is a great video that everyone needs to watch that shows the Bush regimes main goal from day 1 in office.


http://www.ronpaulaudio.com/rpaudio/I...

Added: October 01, 2007




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The controversial new documentary 9/11: Press for Truth raises important questions concerning the executive branches wrap up following 9/11 and is sure to inspire controversy and debate.


The film tells the story of four women who united together after each losing a family member to the 9/11 disaster. Feeling that the government had not spent nearly enough time investigating 9/11 or preparing for such an attack after several previous warnings, the women took on their own investigation, rallying the press toward their cause and putting pressure on the executive branch to launch a more thorough investigation.


The film makes accusations that may seem excessive, even ridiculous, at first, but as the story continues and ample information is provided to back claims, the points that the film strives to make begin to seem well-founded.


The film certainly inspires deep thought by raising important questions. Why did the World Trade center bulding seven tower inadvertently collapse when it was not even hit by a plane? Were explosives inside the building? Why was more money spent investigating Monica Lewinsky during the Clinton administration than was spent investigating 9/11 in 2001? Why didn't we, as the film suggests, capture Osama Bin Laden when we had him cornered in a cave in Afghanistan?


The film brings to attention the fact that the current administration has dodged these questions with suspicious awkwardness. Using live news and press footage, the film depicts the administration as a careless group of people, clearly lying to the American people and doing nothing to satisfy the desires of the nation. Interestingly enough, the majority of the accusers are Republicans, turned against an executive branch representing their own party.


Opinions aside, the film is very informative. Providing a great deal of detail concerning the steps taken following the 9/11 tragedy, Press for Truth uses media coverage from the past five years as a tool in revealing the irresponsiveness of the administration.


The film is certainly worth seeing. It poses a menagerie of questions that deserve to be answered, no matter what political ideology a person holds.


The official version of events is itself a conspiracy, Osama in a cave with nothing but a laptop directed the most diabolic crime in U.S. history, defeated a trillion dollar air defense and brought down three of the most well constructed buildings in the world using nothing but 19 men (6 of which are still alive) armed with box cutters because they "Hate our freedom" as Bush stated??
Added: October 30, 2007

----------------------------------------------------------------
About This Video

9/11 Coincidences (Part Seven)
----------------------------
Happy As Larry - The WTC7 Implosion
----------------------------

Please visit the website to order the full version of 9/11 Mysteries:


http://www.911mysteries.com


Everyone remembers the Twin Towers exploding at 9:59AM and 10:28AM EDT on September 11, 2001. Comparatively few people can recall that there was a third massive skyscraper, also a part of the World Trade Center, which fell very rapidly to the ground on that day. This was World Trade Center Building 7. One reason that few remember WTC Building 7's collapse is that after September 11th it has been treated, both in the media and in The 9/11 Commission Report, as if it didn't happen.

The total collapse of the third huge skyscraper late in the afternoon September 11th was reported as if it were an insignificant footnote... most people never saw video of Building 7's collapse... Incredibly, it is virtually impossible to find any mention of Building 7 in newspapers, magazines, or broadcast media reports after September 11th."

The Commission avoids another embarrassing problem -- explaining how WTC 7 could have collapsed, also virtually at free-fall speed -- by simply not mentioning the collapse of this building.

The collapse of Building 7 at 5:20PM EDT was in itself a major event; the sudden and unexplained fall to earth of a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper is certainly news. Why has there been almost no mention of this in the US media, and why was there no mention of Building 7's collapse in The 9/11 Commission Report? These are questions of great significance, and they cry out for answers. To be able to approach any kind of explanation, however, first some pertinent and verified facts of the Building 7 aspect of 9/11 need to be scrutinized.

The fires in WTC 7 were very few and small, and certainly not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible, yet it came down in perfect symmetry in just 6 seconds. WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein said to the fire department commander "the smartest thing to do is pull it." Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to "blow up". The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint. Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

There can be only one conclusion as to what happened to WTC 7 - it was demolished.

Silverstein Properties made billions from the insurance policies he set up on the WTC complex just a few weeks before 9/11. He specifically took out insurance policies to cover terrorist attacks, then a few weeks later 9/11 happened. What are the odds on that?

Added: April 18, 2007




 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.03 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1036659