Date:   10/18/2007 9:14:55 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   10,274
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1023709

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

>- *** On the contrary, you are very much competing, just as I am competing.

Actually, I am not. I do not sell zappers for use on humans and have not for a year and a half. I do sell them for water treatment purposes. The old sites remain up for information purposes.

>- *** This is technically correct. Which is why I chose to produce a wave that is squarer than square, in the metaphoric sense, and remains square because it is stabilized

First, it is misleading and false for you to claim that a square wave can be squarer than square. Yours is not a true square wave.

Additionally, the wave that you think so highly of has only half the power of any frequency compared to a true square wave.

Also, it does not produce even harmonics as you claim. Instead, it produces a second set of odd harmonics.

Lastly, you are only comparing your stabilized output to the cheaper models of zappers. ParaZapper CCa has a stabillized output due to the CCa technology. We just do not make such a big dealabout the stabilizing because the current boost is more important.


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1023709