CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: On "Electro-magnetic Energy--NOT--(Radiation?)" by Corinthian ..... Alkaline/Acid Debate Forum

Date:   10/16/2007 11:24:26 AM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   2,126
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1022180

2 of 4 (50%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

"the positive or negative attraction between two electromagnetically charged particles is analogous to the force of gravity."

What we are talking about here is particles that have been ionized by specific wavelengths of radiation.  They obtain a charge and naturally will exert a force on each other proportional to q1q2/r^2.  This has more to do with electrostatics than with EM radiation.  It has nothing to do with what ML writes.


The same with your other quote
"The production of free radicals during mitochondrial respiration is part of a vital cellular process where electromagnetic energy (electron transport) is transformed into chemical energy through the production of a high-phosphate donor.............."
Again in this case, we have 1 specific ionized molecule transferring its charge onto other molecules.  Nothing to do with what ML writes.

How can you talk about being blinded by word use.  If ML is using the wrong words then he is not communicating the correct idea.  Actually it is worse than that, because in most case he is just communicating nonsense.  When you are talking about a basic, fundamental aspect of the physics we cannot rely on a poorly educated retiree to redefine all of physics to suit his insane ideas.

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1022180